ArticleIn silico pharmacology2018
In silico quest of selective naphthyl-based CREBBP bromodomain inhibitor.
Article in In silico pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Marine natural compounds as potential CBP bromodomain inhibitors for treating cancer: an in-silico approach using molecular docking, ADMET, molecular dynamics simulations and MM-PBSA binding free energy calculations.In silico pharmacology · 2024Article
- Deciphering Molecular Mechanism of the Neuropharmacological Action of Fucosterol through Integrated System Pharmacology andMarine drugs · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reader proteins like bromodomains have recently gained increased attentions in the area of epigenetic drug discovery, as they are the potent regulators in gene transcription process. Among the other bromodomains, cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) binding protein or CREBBP bomodomain involved in various cancer progressions and therefore, efforts to develop specific inhibitors of CREBBP bomodomain are of clinical value. In this study, we tried to identify selective CREBBP bromodomain inhibitor, which was accomplished by using molecular docking, free energy calculation and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation studies, considering a series of naphthyl based compounds. The docking procedure was validated by comparing root mean square deviations (RMSDs) of crystallographic complex to docked complex. Favorable electrostatic interactions with the Arg1173 side chain were considered to attain selectivity for CREBBP bromodomain over other human bromodomain subfamilies. We found that naphthyl-based compounds have greater binding affinities towards the CREBBP bromodomain, and formed non-bonded interactions with various side chain residues that are important for bromodomain inhibition. From detailed investigation by induced fit docking, compound 31 was found to have favorable electrostatic interactions with the Arg1173 side chain by forming conventional hydrogen bonds. This result was further confirmed by analyzing hydrogen bond occupancy and bonding distance during the molecular dynamics simulation. We believe that these findings offer useful insight for the designing of target specific new bromodomain inhibitor and also promote further structure guided synthesis of analogues for identification of potent CREBBP bromodomain inhibitors as well as detailed in vitro and in vivo analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.