Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607297›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastric cancer2018

Can proximal Gastrectomy Be Justified for Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction?

Yuya Sato, Hitoshi Katai, Maiko Ito, Masahiro Yura, Sho Otsuki, Yukinori Yamagata, Shinji Morita

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastric cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Indication of Proximal Gastrectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Based on Lymph Node Metastasis at the Distal Part of the Stomach.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuya SatoDivision of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7612-8279
Hitoshi KataiDivision of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1547-8421
Maiko ItoDivision of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4480-7140
Masahiro YuraDivision of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4150-2085
Sho OtsukiDivision of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-4857
Yukinori YamagataDivision of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2624-1251
Shinji MoritaDivision of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-7656
Tokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the status of number 3b lymph node (LN) station in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) and to investigate the optimal indications for radical proximal gastrectomy (PG) for AEG. MATERIALS AND

methodsData of 51 patients with clinically advanced Siewert types II and III AEG who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) between April 2010 and July 2017 were reviewed. The proportion of metastatic LNs at each LN station was examined. Number 3 LN station was separately classified into number 3a and number 3b. The risk factors for number 3b LN metastasis and the clinicopathological features of number 3b-positive AEG patients were investigated.

resultsThe incidences of LN metastasis were the highest in number 1 (47.1%), followed by number 2 (23.5%), number 3a (39.2%), and number 7 (23.5%) LN stations. LN metastasis in number 3b LN station was detected in 4 patients (7.8%). A gastric invasion length of more than 40 mm was a significant risk factor for number 3b LN metastasis. All 4 patients with number 3b-positive AEG had advanced cancer with a gastric invasion length of more than 40 mm. The 5-year survival rate of patients with a gastric invasion length of more than 40 mm was 50.0%.

conclusionsRadical PG may be indicated for patients with AEG with gastric invasion length of less than 40 mm.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junctionEsophagogastric junctionLesser curvature lymph nodesProximal gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID30607297
PMCPMC6310770
OpenAlexW2899864725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.