Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607295›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastric cancer2018

Evidence-Based Practice Guideline for Surgical Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 2018.

Ho Seok Seo, Miyoung Choi, Sang-Yong Son, Min Gyu Kim, Dong-Seok Han, Han Hong Lee

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastric cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Clinical observation of the anti-reflux treatment for the chronic pharyngitis patients with the reflux finding score from 8 to 10].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ho Seok SeoGuideline Committee of Korean Anti-Reflux Surgery (KARS) Study Group.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3606-6074
Miyoung ChoiDivision of Health Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2424-9965
Sang-Yong SonGuideline Committee of Korean Anti-Reflux Surgery (KARS) Study Group.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8903-0913
Min Gyu KimGuideline Committee of Korean Anti-Reflux Surgery (KARS) Study Group.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9943-0083
Dong-Seok HanGuideline Committee of Korean Anti-Reflux Surgery (KARS) Study Group.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9003-7987
Han Hong LeeGuideline Committee of Korean Anti-Reflux Surgery (KARS) Study Group.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7541-8490
Guideline Geo (Sweden) · SEHanyang University Guri Hospital · KRNational Evidenc- based healthcare Collaborating Agency · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing in Korea, and physicians, including surgeons, have been focusing on its treatment. Indeed, in Korea, medical treatment using a proton pump inhibitor is the mainstream treatment for GERD, while awareness of surgical treatment is limited. Accordingly, to promote the understanding of surgical treatment for GERD, the Korean Anti-Reflux Surgery Study Group published the Evidence-Based Practice Guideline for the Surgical Treatment of GERD. The guideline consists of 2 sections: fundamental information such as the definition, symptoms, and diagnostic tools of GERD and a recommendation statement about its surgical treatment. The recommendations presented 5 debates regarding fundoplication: 1) comparison of the effectiveness of medical and surgical treatments, 2) effectiveness of surgical treatment in cases of refractory GERD, 3) effectiveness of surgical treatment of extraesophageal symptoms, 4) comparison of effectiveness between total and partial fundoplication, and 5) effectiveness of fundoplication in cases of hiatal hernia. The present guideline is the first to demonstrate the efficacy of the surgical treatment GERD in Korea.

Indexed as

FundoplicationGastroesophageal refluxGuidelineSystematic reviewTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30607295
PMCPMC6310769
OpenAlexW2907561542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.