Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607259›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2018

Involving young people in BRIGHTLIGHT from study inception to secondary data analysis: insights from 10 years of user involvement.

Rachel M Taylor, Jeremy S Whelan, Faith Gibson, Sue Morgan, Lorna A Fern, BRIGHTLIGHT Team, Young Advisory Panel (YAP), Core Consumer Group (CCG) and National Cancer Research Institute Teenage and Young Adult Clinical Studies Group (NCRI TYA CSG)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel M Taylor1Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0853-0925
Jeremy S Whelan1Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Faith Gibson2School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH UK.
Sue Morgan4Teenage Cancer Trust Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK.
Lorna A Fern1Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
BRIGHTLIGHT Team
Young Advisory Panel (YAP)
Core Consumer Group (CCG) and National Cancer Research Institute Teenage and Young Adult Clinical Studies Group (NCRI TYA CSG)

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1209-10013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

plain english summaryYoung people with cancer are often described as 'hard to reach', 'difficult to engage' and/or 'vulnerable'. Consequently, they are often over looked for patient and public involvement activities. We set out to involve young people with cancer to work as co-researchers in the design of the largest ever study of young people with cancer, called BRIGHTLIGHT. In the 10 years since the BRIGHTLIGHT feasibility work began we have involved more than 1200 young people as co-researchers, collaborators, consultants and dissemination partners. We chronicle the key points of this 10-year journey, sharing our success, describing our challenges and the solutions we put in place; sharing also what worked and did not work. Here we share some of these experiences of involving young people in this research and offer some practical advice for those looking to do the same. ABSTRACT:

Indexed as

AdolescentsBRIGHTLIGHTCancerConsumersDisseminationPatient and public involvementRecruitmentRetentionTeenagersYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID30607259
PMCPMC6307198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.