Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607126›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2018

Use of targeted therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: clinical and economic impact in a Canadian real-life setting.

S Nazha, S Tanguay, A Kapoor, M Jewett, C Kollmannsberger, L Wood, G Bjarnason, D Heng, D Soulières, N Reaume and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Deregulation and delocalization of the mHistology and histopathology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Epidemiology of Lung Metastases.Frontiers in medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Global & regional health technology assessment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

S NazhaMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC.
S TanguayMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC.
A KapoorMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
M JewettPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
C KollmannsbergerUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
L WoodDalhousie University and qeii Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS.
G BjarnasonSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
D HengTom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
D SoulièresCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC.
N ReaumeUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
N BasappaCross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
E LévesqueCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, University of Laval, Quebec City, QC.
A DragomirMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Outside of randomized controlled clinical trials, the understanding of the effectiveness and costs associated with targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc) is limited in Canada. The purpose of the present study was to use real-world prospective data to assess the effectiveness and cost of targeted therapies for patients with mrcc. Methods: The Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System, a pan-Canadian database, was used to identify prospectively collected data relating to patients with mrcc. First- and subsequent-line time to treatment termination (ttt) was determined from therapy initiation time (sunitinib or pazopanib) to discontinuation of therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted overall survival (os) by treatment. Unit treatment cost was used to estimate the cost by line of treatment and the total cost of therapy for the management of patients with mrcc. Results: The study included 475 patients receiving sunitinib or pazopanib in the first-line setting. Patients were treated mostly with sunitinib (81%); 19% of patients were treated with pazopanib. The median ttt in the first line was 7.7 months for patients receiving sunitinib and 4.6 months for those receiving pazopanib ( Conclusions: For the two therapies, os differed significantly, with a higher median os being observed in the sunitinib group. The cost of treatment was higher in the sunitinib group, which is to be expected with longer survival.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAdultAgedCanadaCarcinoma, Renal CellCombined Modality TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards Modelseffectivenessreal-world dataRenal cell carcinomasafetytargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID30607126
PMCPMC6291289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.