Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607124›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2018

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in young women with breast cancer: a population-based analysis of predictive factors and clinical impact.

A Bouchard-Fortier, N N Baxter, R Sutradhar, K Fernandes, X Camacho, P Graham, M L Quan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Salvage Nipple-sparing Mastectomy for Patients with Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Case Series of Brazilian Patients.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Imaging in Locoregional Management of Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A Bouchard-FortierDivision of Surgical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
N N BaxterDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
R SutradharInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON.
K FernandesInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON.
X CamachoInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON.
P GrahamDivision of Surgical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
M L QuanDivision of Surgical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA3M (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (cpm) has been increasingly common among women with unilateral invasive breast cancer (ibca) even though the data that support it are limited. Using a population-based cohort, the objectives of the present study were to describe factors predictive of cpm in young women (≤35 years) with ibca and to evaluate the impact of the procedure on mortality. Methods: All women diagnosed during 1994-2003 and treated with cpm were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Logistic regression was used to identify patient and tumour factors associated with the use of cpm. Multivariate analyses were used to assess the effect of cpm on recurrence and mortality. Results: Of 614 women identified, 81 underwent cpm (13.2%). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with cpm included negative lymph node status, negative estrogen receptor status, and initial breast-conserving surgery with re-excision. At follow-up, breast cancer-specific mortality was similar for women who did and did not undergo cpm. Conclusions: Use of cpm in young women with ibca (compared with non-use) was not associated improved breast cancer-specific mortality. Factors found to be predictive of cpm were negative lymph node status, negative estrogen receptor status, and initial breast-conserving surgery followed by re-excision.

Indexed as

Prophylactic MastectomyAdultAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioOntarioPopulation SurveillancePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRecurrenceRegistriesbreast cancerContralateral prophylactic mastectomyyoung women

Identifiers

PMID30607124
PMCPMC6291287
OpenAlexW2905125077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.