Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607120›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2018

Impact of high-fidelity e-learning on knowledge acquisition and satisfaction in radiation oncology trainees.

C Gillan, J Papadakos, J Brual, N Harnett, A Hogan, E Milne, M E Giuliani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Successful implementation of online educational lectures of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The landscape of digital resources in radiation oncology.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C GillanRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
J PapadakosCancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
J BrualDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
N HarnettRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
A HoganRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
E MilneRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
M E GiulianiRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: e-Learning is an underutilized tool in education for the health professions, and radiation medicine, given its reliance on technology for clinical practice, is well-suited to training simulation in online environments. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the knowledge impact and user interface satisfaction of high-(hf) compared with low-fidelity (lf) e-learning modules (e-modules) in radiation oncology training. Methods: Two versions of an e-module on lung radiotherapy (lf and hf) were developed. Radiation oncology residents and fellows were invited to be randomized to complete either the lf or the hf module through individual online accounts over a 2-week period. A 25-item multiple-choice knowledge assessment was administered before and after module completion, and user interface satisfaction was measured using the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (quis) tool. Results: Of 18 trainees, 8 were randomized to the lf module, and 10, to the hf module. Overall, knowledge assessment performance increased (11%, Conclusions: The hf e-module had a greater impact on knowledge acquisition, and users expressed satisfaction with the interface in both the hf and lf situations. The use of e-learning in a competency-based curriculum could have educational advantages; participants expressed benefits and drawbacks. Preferences for e-learning integration in education for the health professions should be explored further.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionInternship and ResidencyLearningPersonal SatisfactionEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleRadiation OncologyStudents, Medicale-learningRadiation medicineradiation oncology traininguser interaction satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID30607120
PMCPMC6291292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.