Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607110›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2018

Outcomes by treatment modality in elderly patients with localized gastric and esophageal cancer.

A Natori, B A Chan, H W Sim, L Ma, D W Yokom, E Chen, G Liu, G Darling, C Swallow, S Brar and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

A NatoriPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
B A ChanPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
H W SimPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
L MaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
D W YokomPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
E ChenPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
G LiuPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
G DarlingPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
C SwallowPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
S BrarPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
J BrierleyPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
J RingashPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
R WongPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
J KimPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
P RogallaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
S Hafezi-BakhtiariDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
J ConnerMount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON.
J KnoxPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
E ElimovaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
R W JangPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
University of Toronto · CAUniversity Health Network · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CAToronto General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess current treatment patterns and outcomes in elderly patients with localized gastric and esophageal (ge) cancers. Methods: This retrospective analysis considered patients 75 years of age or older with ge cancers treated during 2012-2014. Patient demographics and tumour characteristics were collected. Overall survival (os) and disease-free survival were assessed by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for demographics. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine factors affecting treatment choices. Results: The 110 patients in the study cohort had a median age of 81 years (range: 75-99 years). Primary disease sites were esophageal (55%) and gastric (45%). Treatment received included radiation therapy alone (29%), surgery alone (26%), surgery plus perioperative therapy (14%), chemoradiation alone (10%), and supportive care alone (14%). In multivariable analyses, surgery (hazard ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.26 to 0.90; Conclusions: At our institution, few patients 75 years of age and older received multimodality therapy for localized ge cancers. Outcomes were better for patients who underwent surgery than for those who did not. To ensure optimal treatment selection, comprehensive geriatric assessment should be considered for patients 75 years of age and older with localized ge cancers.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeElderly patientsesophageal cancergastric cancergeriatric assessmentstreatment selection

Identifiers

PMID30607110
PMCPMC6291271
OpenAlexW2905357051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.