ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Single Endoloop Stump Closure.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review on the cost evaluation of two different laparoscopic surgical techniques among 996 appendectomies from a single center.Updates in surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022Article
- Amyand's hernia: a 10-year experience with 6 cases.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic Appendectomy versus Open Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesAlthough laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been used for 35 years, the open approach (OA) is preferred worldwide. Widespread access to instrumentation in a number of centers has reduced economic and logistical obstacles. The aim of this work is to compare the results for patients with suspected appendicitis treated using an OA versus patients treated using LA.
methodsA retrospective study of all patients (N = 290) who underwent operation due to suspected appendicitis in the General Surgery Department from 2014 to 2017 was conducted. LA was performed in 91 patients, and OA was performed in 199 patients.
resultsAverage surgery duration was 67.8 minutes in the LA group and 62.9 minutes in the OA group (
conclusionThe duration of LA is not considerably longer than that of OA. LA in patients with suspected appendicitis reduces the number of operation site infections compared with OA. LA with single endoloop stump closure is a safe method and may be recommended for wider applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.