Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30606883›Full record

Observational studyThe oncologist2019

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Advanced Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors (GI NET): A Multicenter Retrospective Chart Review Study.

Matthew H Kulke, Al B Benson, Arvind Dasari, Lynn Huynh, Beilei Cai, Todor Totev, Nina Roesner, Mei Sheng Duh, Maureen P Neary, Victoria E Maurer and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Treatment Patterns of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogs for Neuroendocrine Tumors.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew H KulkeDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Matthew.Kulke@bmc.org.
Al B BensonRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5485-7227
Arvind DasariMD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5271-9744
Lynn HuynhAnalysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Beilei CaiNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2762-3908
Todor TotevAnalysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0253-325X
Nina RoesnerAnalysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mei Sheng DuhAnalysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4851-0144
Maureen P NearyNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Victoria E MaurerRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Brandon E ShihHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Cecile G DagohoyMD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jennifer ChanDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Emily K BergslandHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7754-6552
Analysis Group (United States) · USNorthwestern University · USNovartis (United States) · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · USBoston University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe assessed treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) at four large tertiary referral centers in the U.S. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of patients aged ≥18 years at advanced GI NET diagnosis, treated between July 2011 and December 2014. Index date was the histologically confirmed diagnosis date of locally advanced/metastatic GI NET. Data included baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, progression, death, and GI NET-related health care resource utilization from index date through last contact or death. Time-to-event analyses, including treatment discontinuation, progression, and overall survival (OS), were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

resultsWe identified 273 patients; 156 (57%) had primary ileum NET, and 174 (64%) had functional NET. First-line treatments included somatostatin analog (SSA) alone (89%) or in combination (2%), liver-directed therapy (LDT; 8%), and cytotoxic chemotherapy or interferon (2%). One hundred fifty-five patients continued with second-line therapy, including SSA alone (17%) or in combination (75%, with 3% combined with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy), LDT (4%), and other treatments (3%). Median time (months) to first-line discontinuation was 154.0 for SSAs and 3.8 for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Overall median time to investigator-assessed progression following treatment initiation was 30.3 months. Median OS (months) following first-line initiation was 151.8 for all patients and 178.9 for first-line SSA.

conclusionOur study illustrates the common use of SSAs in both first-line and subsequent treatment of patients with GI NETs, as well as the relatively long survival durations and multiple additional treatments received by patients with this condition. Treatment pattern assessment at later times, following approval of newer treatments, is warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study, assessing treatment patterns over a period of up to 30 years, showed that SSAs, LDT, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and interferon are common treatments for advanced GI NETs. SSAs alone or in combination with other treatments were the most frequent therapy in first and subsequent lines. Patients in this study remained on SSAs long-term, with median treatment duration of 12.8 years in first line. Treatment patterns should be assessed beyond this study's time period, given recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals for additional treatments for GI NET, which will likely be incorporated in the continuum of care of patients.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyDisease ProgressionEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansInterferon-alphaKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPeptides, CyclicInterferon-alphalanreotidePeptides, CyclicRadiopharmaceuticalsSomatostatinGastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumorReal‐world analysisSomatostatin analogsTreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID30606883
PMCPMC6693731
OpenAlexW2908277915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.