Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30606801›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Type I interferon response impairs differentiation potential of pluripotent stem cells.

Julie Eggenberger, Daniel Blanco-Melo, Maryline Panis, Kristen J Brennand, Benjamin R tenOever

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genomic Engineering of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie EggenbergerDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029.
Daniel Blanco-MeloDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029.
Maryline PanisDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029.
Kristen J BrennandDepartment of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029.
Benjamin R tenOeverDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029; Benjamin.tenOever@mssm.edu.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM: MECHANISMS OF VIRUS-HOST INTERACTIONST32AI007647 · NIAID · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI Domenico Tortorella · 2000 to 2026
$11.5M
Contrasting causal microRNAs in forebrain and midbrain COS hiPSC neural cellsR01MH101454 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BRENNAND, KRISTEN JENNIFER · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
Stemness and the cellular response to virus infectionR21AI132913 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI TENOEVER, BENJAMIN R. · 2018 to 2019
$480k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI132913NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007647NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upon virus infection, pluripotent stem cells neither induce nor respond to canonical type I interferons (IFN-I). To better understand this biology, we characterized induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) as well as their differentiated parental or rederived counterparts. We confirmed that only iPSCs failed to respond to viral RNA, IFN-I, or viral infection. This lack of response could be phenocopied in fibroblasts with the expression of a reprogramming factor which repressed the capacity to induce canonical antiviral pathways. To ascertain the consequences of restoring the antiviral response in the context of pluripotency, we engineered a system to engage these defenses in iPSCs. Inducible expression of a recombinant virus-activated transcription factor resulted in the successful reconstitution of antiviral defenses through the direct up-regulation of IFN-I-stimulated genes. Induction of the antiviral signature in iPSCs, even for a short duration, resulted in the dysregulation of genes associated with all three germ layers despite maintaining pluripotency markers. Trilineage differentiation of these same cells showed that engagement of the antiviral defenses compromised ectoderm and endoderm formation and dysregulated the development of mesodermal sublineages. In all, these data suggest that the temporal induction of the antiviral response primes iPSCs away from pluripotency and induces numerous aberrant gene products upon differentiation. Together these results suggest that the IFN-I system and pluripotency may be incompatible with each other and thus explain why stem cells do not utilize the canonical antiviral system.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsBiomarkersCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingEctodermEndodermFibroblastsGerm LayersHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsInterferon Type IKruppel-Like Factor 4RNA, ViralTranscription FactorsUp-RegulationAntiviral AgentsBiomarkersInterferon Type IKLF4 protein, humanKruppel-Like Factor 4RNA, ViralTranscription FactorsinterferonIRF7KLF4pluripotencyvirus

Identifiers

PMID30606801
PMCPMC6347712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.