Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30606716›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2019

Circulating high sensitivity C reactive protein concentrations and risk of lung cancer: nested case-control study within Lung Cancer Cohort Consortium.

David C Muller, Tricia L Larose, Allison Hodge, Florence Guida, Arnulf Langhammer, Kjell Grankvist, Klaus Meyer, Qiuyin Cai, Alan A Arslan, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte and 35 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association between systemic conditions and the development of glaucoma in a longitudinal large-scale health examination cohort.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Modern sources of controls in case-control studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

45 authors at 20 institutions in 9 countries.

David C MullerGenetic Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France david.muller@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2350-0417
Tricia L LaroseGenetic Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Allison HodgeCancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Florence GuidaGenetic Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Arnulf LanghammerHUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway.
Kjell GrankvistDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Klaus MeyerBevital AS, Bergen, Norway.
Qiuyin CaiDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Alan A ArslanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Anne Zeleniuch-JacquotteDepartment of Population Health and Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Demetrius AlbanesDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Graham G GilesCancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Howard D SessoDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
I-Min LeeDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J Michael GazianoDivision of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jian-Min YuanUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Judith Hoffman BoltonGeorge W Comstock Center for Public Health Research and Prevention Health Monitoring Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Julie E BuringDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Kala VisvanathanGeorge W Comstock Center for Public Health Research and Prevention Health Monitoring Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Loic Le MarchandEpidemiology Program, Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Mark P PurdueDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Neil E CaporasoDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Øivind MidttunBevital AS, Bergen, Norway.
Per M UelandDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ross L PrenticeDivision of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Stephanie J WeinsteinDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Victoria L StevensEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Wei ZhengDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
William J BlotDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Xiao-Ou ShuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Xuehong ZhangChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Yong-Bing XiangState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes and Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Woon-Puay KohDuke-NUS Medical School Singapore, Singapore.
Kristian HveemKG Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Cynthia A ThomsonHealth Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Mary PettingerDivision of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Gunnar EngströmDepartment of Clinical Science in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Hans BrunnströmPathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Laboratory Medicine Region Skåne, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Roger L MilneCancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Meir J StampferDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jiali HanDepartment of Epidemiology, Richard M Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Mikael JohanssonDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Paul BrennanGenetic Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Gianluca SeveriCancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mattias JohanssonGenetic Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRVanderbilt University · USNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOThe University of Melbourne · AUBevital (Norway) · NOFred Hutch Cancer Center · USJohns Hopkins University · USLund University · SENational Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USNew York University · USAmerican Cancer Society · USDuke-NUS Medical School · SGHaukeland University Hospital · NOIndiana University Health · USInserm · FRRenji Hospital · CNUmeå University · SEUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Understanding Population Differences in Cancer: The MEC StudyU01CA164973 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI HAIMAN, CHRISTOPHER ALAN, LE MARCHAND, LOIC · 2015 to 2025
$37.4M
Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) StudyZIACP010195 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ALBANES, DEMETRIUS · 2009 to 2025
$22.5M
Prospective studies of cancer etiology and prevention in Shanghai and SingaporeR01CA144034 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YUAN, JIAN-MIN · 2010 to 2014
$7.0M
Shanghai Womens Health StudyUM1CA182910 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2014 to 2018
$5.9M
DIETARY FACTORS IN THE ETIOLOGY OF CANCER IN SHANGHAIR01CA043092 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI YUAN, JIAN-MIN · 1987 to 2006
$5.8M
THE SINGAPORE COHORT STUDY OF DIET AND CANCERR01CA080205 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI YUAN, JIAN-MIN · 1999 to 2009
$5.3M
Shanghai Men's Health StudyUM1CA173640 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHU, XIAO-OU · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
One-carbon metabolism biomarkers and lung cancer riskU01CA155340 · NCI · INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RES ON CANCER · PI BRENNAN, PAUL JOSEPH · 2011 to 2015
$4.9M
Cancer epidemiology cohorts in Shanghai and Singapore UM1CA182876 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YUAN, JIAN-MIN · 2014 to 2018
$4.3M
The NYU Women's Health StudyUM1CA182934 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ZELENIUCH-JAQUOTTE, ANNE · 2015 to 2019
$3.7M
Cancer Research UK 24390NCI NIH HHS R01 CA043092NCI NIH HHS R01 CA080205NCI NIH HHS R01 CA144034NCI NIH HHS U01 CA155340NCI NIH HHS U01 CA164973NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA173640NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182876NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182910NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182934NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600001CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600002CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600003CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600004CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600018CWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo conduct a comprehensive analysis of prospectively measured circulating high sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration and risk of lung cancer overall, by smoking status (never, former, and current smokers), and histological sub-type.

designNested case-control study.

setting20 population based cohort studies in Asia, Europe, Australia, and the United States.

participants5299 patients with incident lung cancer, with individually incidence density matched controls. EXPOSURE: Circulating hsCRP concentrations in prediagnostic serum or plasma samples.

main outcome measureIncident lung cancer diagnosis.

resultsA positive association between circulating hsCRP concentration and the risk of lung cancer for current (odds ratio associated with a doubling in hsCRP concentration 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.13) and former smokers (1.09, 1.04 to 1.14) was observed, but not for never smokers (P<0.01 for interaction). This association was strong and consistent across all histological subtypes, except for adenocarcinoma, which was not strongly associated with hsCRP concentration regardless of smoking status (odds ratio for adenocarcinoma overall 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.94 to 1.01). The association between circulating hsCRP concentration and the risk of lung cancer was strongest in the first two years of follow-up for former and current smokers. Including hsCRP concentration in a risk model, in addition to smoking based variables, did not improve risk discrimination overall, but slightly improved discrimination for cancers diagnosed in the first two years of follow-up.

conclusionsFormer and current smokers with higher circulating hsCRP concentrations had a higher risk of lung cancer overall. Circulating hsCRP concentration was not associated with the risk of lung adenocarcinoma. Circulating hsCRP concentration could be a prediagnostic marker of lung cancer rather than a causal risk factor.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Large CellCarcinoma, Small CellCarcinoma, Squamous CellCase-Control StudiesC-Reactive ProteinEx-SmokersFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID30606716
PMCPMC6315896
OpenAlexW2908386505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.