Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30606610›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2019

Double-strand break repair plays a role in repeat instability in a fragile X mouse model.

Inbal Gazy, Bruce Hayward, Svetlana Potapova, Xiaonan Zhao, Karen Usdin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Mechanisms of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. The Relevance of G-Quadruplexes for DNA Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. CGG Repeat Expansion, and ElevatedFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inbal GazySection on Gene Structure and Disease, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States.
Bruce HaywardSection on Gene Structure and Disease, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States.
Svetlana PotapovaSection on Gene Structure and Disease, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States.
Xiaonan ZhaoSection on Gene Structure and Disease, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States.
Karen UsdinSection on Gene Structure and Disease, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States. Electronic address: ku@helix.nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Understanding the mutational mechanism responsible for the Repeat Expansion DiseasesZIADK057808 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI USDIN, KAREN P. · 2009 to 2025
$14.1M
Mechanism of repeat expansion in Fragile X syndromeZ01DK057808 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI USDIN, KAREN P. · 2007 to 2008
$570k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK057808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expansion of a CGG-repeat tract in the 5' UTR of FMR1 is responsible for the Fragile X-related disorders (FXDs), FXTAS, FXPOI and FXS. Previous work in a mouse model of these disorders has implicated proteins in the base excision and the mismatch repair (MMR) pathways in the expansion mechanism. However, the precise role of these factors in this process is not well understood. The essential role of MutLγ, a complex that plays a minor role in MMR but that is essential for resolving Holliday junctions during meiosis, raises the possibility that expansions proceed via a Holliday junction-like intermediate that is processed to generate a double-strand break (DSB). We show here in an FXD mouse model that LIG4, a ligase essential for non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), a form of DSB repair (DSBR), protects against expansions. However, a mutation in MRE11, a nuclease that is important for several other DSBR pathways including homologous recombination (HR), has no effect on the extent of expansion. Our results suggest that the expansion pathway competes with NHEJ for the processing of a DSB intermediate. Thus, expansion likely proceeds via an NHEJ-independent DSBR pathway that may also be HR-independent.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDNA End-Joining RepairDNA Ligase ATPFragile X SyndromeHepatocytesHomologous RecombinationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLDNA Ligase ATPLig4 protein, mouseDNA ligase IV (Lig4)Double-strand break repair (DSBR)Fragile X related disordersFragile X syndrome (FXS)MRE11Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ)Repeat Expansion Diseases

Identifiers

PMID30606610
PMCPMC6366319
OpenAlexW2906203237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.