Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30606448›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2019

Nonlinear Actomyosin Elasticity in Muscle?

Alf Månsson, Malin Persson, Nabil Shalabi, Dilson E Rassier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanical interplay between adipose tissues and disease progression.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Myosin Cross-Bridge Behaviour in Contracting Muscle-The TInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alf MånssonDepartment of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden. Electronic address: alf.mansson@lnu.se.
Malin PerssonDepartment of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden; Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nabil ShalabiDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Dilson E RassierDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
McGill University · CALinnaeus University · SE

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclic interactions between myosin II motor domains and actin filaments that are powered by turnover of ATP underlie muscle contraction and have key roles in motility of nonmuscle cells. The elastic characteristics of actin-myosin cross-bridges are central in the force-generating process, and disturbances in these properties may lead to disease. Although the prevailing paradigm is that the cross-bridge elasticity is linear (Hookean), recent single-molecule studies suggest otherwise. Despite convincing evidence for substantial nonlinearity of the cross-bridge elasticity in the single-molecule work, this finding has had limited influence on muscle physiology and physiology of other ordered cellular actin-myosin ensembles. Here, we use a biophysical modeling approach to close the gap between single molecules and physiology. The model is used for analysis of available experimental results in the light of possible nonlinearity of the cross-bridge elasticity. We consider results obtained both under rigor conditions (in the absence of ATP) and during active muscle contraction. Our results suggest that a wide range of experimental findings from mechanical experiments on muscle cells are consistent with nonlinear actin-myosin elasticity similar to that previously found in single molecules. Indeed, the introduction of nonlinear cross-bridge elasticity into the model improves the reproduction of key experimental results and eliminates the need for force dependence of the ATP-induced detachment rate, consistent with observations in other single-molecule studies. The findings have significant implications for the understanding of key features of actin-myosin-based production of force and motion in living cells, particularly in muscle, and for the interpretation of experimental results that rely on stiffness measurements on cells or myofibrils.

Indexed as

ElasticityMuscle ContractionNonlinear DynamicsActomyosinAnimalsHumansActomyosin

Identifiers

PMID30606448
PMCPMC6350078
OpenAlexW2904198162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.