ArticleBiophysical journal2019
Nonlinear Actomyosin Elasticity in Muscle?
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical interplay between adipose tissues and disease progression.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- A mechanokinetic actomyosin model predicts different orthophosphate sensitivities of force and ATP turnover rate during isometric muscle contraction.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Mechanistic insights into effects of the cardiac myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil from mechanokinetic modelling.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Theoretical efficiency limits and speed-efficiency trade-off in myosin motors.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Insights into Muscle Contraction Derived from the Effects of Small-Molecular Actomyosin-Modulating Compounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The Synergic Role of Actomyosin Architecture and Biased Detachment in Muscle Energetics: Insights in Cross Bridge Mechanism Beyond the Lever-Arm Swing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- The effects of inorganic phosphate on muscle force development and energetics: challenges in modelling related to experimental uncertainties.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2021Article
- Single molecule turnover of fluorescent ATP by myosin and actomyosin unveil elusive enzymatic mechanisms.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Hypothesis: Single Actomyosin Properties Account for Ensemble Behavior in Active Muscle Shortening and Isometric Contraction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Straightening Out the Elasticity of Myosin Cross-Bridges.Biophysical journal · 2020Review
- Myosin Cross-Bridge Behaviour in Contracting Muscle-The TInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Comparing models with one versus multiple myosin-binding sites per actin target zone: The power of simplicity.The Journal of general physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cyclic interactions between myosin II motor domains and actin filaments that are powered by turnover of ATP underlie muscle contraction and have key roles in motility of nonmuscle cells. The elastic characteristics of actin-myosin cross-bridges are central in the force-generating process, and disturbances in these properties may lead to disease. Although the prevailing paradigm is that the cross-bridge elasticity is linear (Hookean), recent single-molecule studies suggest otherwise. Despite convincing evidence for substantial nonlinearity of the cross-bridge elasticity in the single-molecule work, this finding has had limited influence on muscle physiology and physiology of other ordered cellular actin-myosin ensembles. Here, we use a biophysical modeling approach to close the gap between single molecules and physiology. The model is used for analysis of available experimental results in the light of possible nonlinearity of the cross-bridge elasticity. We consider results obtained both under rigor conditions (in the absence of ATP) and during active muscle contraction. Our results suggest that a wide range of experimental findings from mechanical experiments on muscle cells are consistent with nonlinear actin-myosin elasticity similar to that previously found in single molecules. Indeed, the introduction of nonlinear cross-bridge elasticity into the model improves the reproduction of key experimental results and eliminates the need for force dependence of the ATP-induced detachment rate, consistent with observations in other single-molecule studies. The findings have significant implications for the understanding of key features of actin-myosin-based production of force and motion in living cells, particularly in muscle, and for the interpretation of experimental results that rely on stiffness measurements on cells or myofibrils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.