Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30606186›Full record

SynthesisBMC urology2019

Paroxetine in the treatment of premature ejaculation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dong Zhang, Yue Cheng, Kerong Wu, Qi Ma, Junhui Jiang, Zejun Yan

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dong ZhangDepartment of Urology & Nephrology, Ningbo First Hospital, The affiliated hospital of ZheJiang University, 59, Liuting Street, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Yue ChengDepartment of Urology & Nephrology, Ningbo First Hospital, The affiliated hospital of ZheJiang University, 59, Liuting Street, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Kerong WuDepartment of Urology & Nephrology, Ningbo First Hospital, The affiliated hospital of ZheJiang University, 59, Liuting Street, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Qi MaDepartment of Urology & Nephrology, Ningbo First Hospital, The affiliated hospital of ZheJiang University, 59, Liuting Street, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Junhui JiangDepartment of Urology & Nephrology, Ningbo First Hospital, The affiliated hospital of ZheJiang University, 59, Liuting Street, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Zejun YanDepartment of Urology & Nephrology, Ningbo First Hospital, The affiliated hospital of ZheJiang University, 59, Liuting Street, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China. 35485787@qq.com.
Ningbo First Hospital · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LY17H050001Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LY18H050003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParoxetine is one of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) used in the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). However, this use is not approved in many countries. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to review the efficacy and safety of paroxetine for PE patients.

methodsWe searched relevant randomized, controlled trials through May 2018, using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register. The main endpoint included intra-vaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and side effects in the treatment of PE. Cochrane Collaboration's Revman software, version 5.3, was used for statistical analysis.

resultsOut of 493 unique articles, a total of 19 randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were reviewed. Quite a few RCTs were considered to have unclear risk of bias because of limited information. Pooled outcomes suggested that paroxetine was more effective than placebo, fluoxetine and escitalopram at increasing IELT (all p < 0.05). However, there existed a high level of heterogeneity in the paroxetine vs. fluoxetine groups and the paroxetine vs. placebo groups. Comparing paroxetine with tramadol, sertraline, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is), local lidocaine gel, behaviour therapy or dapoxetine, we found that the increase in IELT was not statistically significant between groups. Paroxetine combined with tadalafil or behaviour therapy was more efficacious than paroxetine alone (all p < 0.05). Although the side effects in the combination group were more common than in the paroxetine alone group, the most common adverse events, such as nausea, muscle soreness, palpitation and flushing, were mild and tolerable. The main limitations of this systematic review and meta-analysis were the different definitions of PE and short follow-up times.

conclusionsAccording to this systematic review and meta-analysis, paroxetine provided better efficacy than placebo, fluoxetine and escitalopram in the treatment of PE, with well-tolerated side effects. The combination group had better efficacy than the paroxetine alone group.

trial registrationThis review was reported in agreement with the PRISMA statement and was registered on PROSPERO 2018CRD42018097014 .

Indexed as

HumansMaleParoxetinePremature EjaculationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeParoxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsMeta-analysisParoxetinePremature ejaculationSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30606186
PMCPMC6318994
OpenAlexW2915254121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.