SynthesisBMC urology2019
Paroxetine in the treatment of premature ejaculation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of premature ejaculation: a clinical guideline from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS).Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2021Guideline
- Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors for premature ejaculation in adult men.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of different doses of daily paroxetine in patients with lifelong premature ejaculation: a prospective randomized crossover study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Trial
- Synergistic effect of Chaihu-Shugan-San combined with paroxetine tablets in the treatment of acquired premature ejaculation: study protocol for a randomized controlled proof-of-concept trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- A large-scale observational comparison of antidepressants and their effects.Journal of psychiatric research · 2024Observational
- Article
- G protein-coupled receptors in neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Off-label Uses of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs).Current neuropharmacology · 2022Review
- Article
- Redefining a sexual medicine paradigm: subclinical premature ejaculation as a new taxonomic entity.Nature reviews. Urology · 2021Review
- Bioactive Flavonoid Glycosides and HPLC and UPLC Quantification of Commercial Astragali Complanati Semen.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Tramadol and Paroxetine in the Management of Premature Ejaculation.Cureus · 2020Article
- Progresses in pharmaceutical and surgical management of premature ejaculation.Chinese medical journal · 2019Review
- Effect of Yoga in Premature Ejaculation: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.International journal of yogaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundParoxetine is one of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) used in the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). However, this use is not approved in many countries. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to review the efficacy and safety of paroxetine for PE patients.
methodsWe searched relevant randomized, controlled trials through May 2018, using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register. The main endpoint included intra-vaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and side effects in the treatment of PE. Cochrane Collaboration's Revman software, version 5.3, was used for statistical analysis.
resultsOut of 493 unique articles, a total of 19 randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were reviewed. Quite a few RCTs were considered to have unclear risk of bias because of limited information. Pooled outcomes suggested that paroxetine was more effective than placebo, fluoxetine and escitalopram at increasing IELT (all p < 0.05). However, there existed a high level of heterogeneity in the paroxetine vs. fluoxetine groups and the paroxetine vs. placebo groups. Comparing paroxetine with tramadol, sertraline, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is), local lidocaine gel, behaviour therapy or dapoxetine, we found that the increase in IELT was not statistically significant between groups. Paroxetine combined with tadalafil or behaviour therapy was more efficacious than paroxetine alone (all p < 0.05). Although the side effects in the combination group were more common than in the paroxetine alone group, the most common adverse events, such as nausea, muscle soreness, palpitation and flushing, were mild and tolerable. The main limitations of this systematic review and meta-analysis were the different definitions of PE and short follow-up times.
conclusionsAccording to this systematic review and meta-analysis, paroxetine provided better efficacy than placebo, fluoxetine and escitalopram in the treatment of PE, with well-tolerated side effects. The combination group had better efficacy than the paroxetine alone group.
trial registrationThis review was reported in agreement with the PRISMA statement and was registered on PROSPERO 2018CRD42018097014 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.