Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30606151›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2019

"We have to clean ourselves to ensure that our children are healthy and beautiful": findings from a qualitative assessment of a hand hygiene poster in rural Uganda.

B L Harrison, C Ogara, M Gladstone, E D Carrol, J Dusabe-Richards, A Medina-Lara, J Ditai, A D Weeks

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
30.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 375 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

B L HarrisonSanyu Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. beth.harrison122@hotmail.co.uk.
C OgaraSanyu Africa Research Institute (SAfRI), Mbale, Uganda.
M GladstoneSanyu Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
E D CarrolInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Mbale, Uganda.
J Dusabe-RichardsLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
A Medina-LaraUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
J DitaiSanyu Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
A D WeeksSanyu Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBBusitema University · UGLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBSanyu Africa Research Institute · UGUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M017990/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal sepsis is a major cause of mortality worldwide, with most deaths occurring in low-income countries. The World Health Organisation (WHO) '5 Moments for Hand Hygiene' poster has been used to reduce hospital-acquired infections, but there is no similar tool to prevent community-acquired newborn infections in low-resource settings. This assessment, part of the BabyGel Pilot study, evaluated the acceptability of the 'Newborn Moments for Hand Hygiene in the Home' poster. This was an educational tool which aimed to remind mothers in rural Uganda to clean their hands to prevent neonatal infection.

methodsThe BabyGel pilot was a cluster randomised trial that assessed the post-partum use of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) to prevent neonatal infections in Mbale, Uganda. Fifty-five women in 5 village clusters received the ABHR and used it from birth to 3 months postnatally, with use guided by the new poster. Following the study, 5 focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted consisting of 6-8 purposively sampled participants from intervention villages. FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed then translated into English. Transcripts were inductively coded using ATLAS.ti® and qualitatively analysed using thematic content analysis.

resultsMost mothers reported that they understood the message in the poster ("The picture shows me you must use these drugs to keep your baby healthy") and that they could adhere to the moments from the poster. Some participants used the information from the poster to encourage other caregivers to use the ABHR ("after explaining to them, they liked it"). Other potential moments for hand hygiene were introduced by participants, such as after tending to domestic animals and gardening.

conclusionThe poster was well-received, and participants reported compliance with the moments for hand hygiene (although the full body wipe of the baby has since been removed). The poster will be adapted into a sticker format on the ABHR bottle. More focus could be put into an education tool for other caregivers who wish to hold the baby. Overall, the study demonstrated the acceptability of an adapted version of the WHO Moments for Hand Hygiene poster in the introduction of an intervention in the community.

trial registrationISRCTN67852437 , registered 02/03/2015. TRIAL

fundingMedical Research Council/ Wellcome Trust/ DfID (Global Health Trials Scheme).

Indexed as

Hand HygienePosters as TopicRural PopulationAdolescentAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfant, NewbornMothersNeonatal SepsisPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchUgandaBabyGelHand hygieneHealth promotionMoments for hand hygiene posterNeonatal infectionPoster

Identifiers

PMID30606151
PMCPMC6318918
OpenAlexW2943446629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.