Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30606134›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

HIV treatment regimens and adherence to national guidelines in Australia: an analysis of dispensing data from the Australian pharmaceutical benefits scheme.

Nila J Dharan, Tomas Radovich, Samuel Che, Kathy Petoumenos, Prabhjot Juneja, Matthew Law, Robin Huang, Hamish McManus, Mark N Polizzotto, Rebecca Guy and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nila J DharanKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. ndharan@kirby.unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1175-5962
Tomas RadovichProspection Pty Ltd, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.
Samuel CheProspection Pty Ltd, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.
Kathy PetoumenosKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Prabhjot JunejaProspection Pty Ltd, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.
Matthew LawKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Robin HuangKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Hamish McManusKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Mark N PolizzottoKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Rebecca GuyKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Peter CroninProspection Pty Ltd, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.
David A CooperKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Richard T GrayKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUIP Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment guidelines for antiretroviral therapy (ART) have evolved to emphasize newer regimens that address ageing-related comorbidities. Using national Australian dispensing data we compare ART regimens with Australian HIV treatment guidelines in the context of treated comorbidities.

methodsThe study population included all individuals in a 10% sample of national data from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) who purchased a prescription of ART during 2016. We defined each patient's most recently dispensed ART regimen and characterized them to evaluate regimen complexity and adherence to national HIV treatment guidelines. We then analyzed ART regimens in the context of other co-prescriptions purchased for defined comorbidities.

resultsThe 1995 patients in our sample purchased 212 different ART regimens during 2016; 1524 (76.4%) purchased one of the top ten most common regimens of which 62.3% were integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based. Among the 1786 (90%) patients that purchased the most common regimens, 83.7% purchased a regimen recommended by the guidelines for initial antiretroviral therapy and 11.4% purchased antiretrovirals that are not recommended for initial therapy; < 1% of the entire cohort purchased medications not recommended for use. While most patients purchased optimal ART regimens with low potential for significant drug interactions, regimen choices in the setting of risk factors for heart disease, renal disease and low bone mineral density appeared suboptimal.

conclusionsAustralian HIV providers are prescribing ART regimens in accordance with updated treatment guidelines, but could further optimize regimens in the setting of important medical comorbidities.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-HIV AgentsAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolClinical ProtocolsCohort StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHIV InfectionsHumansInfantAnti-HIV AgentsART guidelinesComorbiditiesDrug-drug interactionsHIVPharmaceutical benefits scheme

Identifiers

PMID30606134
PMCPMC6318998
OpenAlexW2913493575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.