Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30606128›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

Viral load detection and management on first line ART in rural Rwanda.

Jean de Dieu Ndagijimana Ntwali, Tom Decroo, Muhayimpundu Ribakare, Athanase Kiromera, Placidie Mugwaneza, Sabin Nsanzimana, Lutgarde Lynen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jean de Dieu Ndagijimana NtwaliInstitute of HIV Disease Prevention and Control, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, 17 avenue, Po. Box 7162, Kigali, Rwanda. ntwalijeado@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0937-8339
Tom DecrooDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Muhayimpundu RibakareInstitute of HIV Disease Prevention and Control, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, 17 avenue, Po. Box 7162, Kigali, Rwanda.
Athanase KiromeraInstitute of Human Virology, Rwanda Program, University of Maryland, Kigali, Rwanda.
Placidie MugwanezaInstitute of HIV Disease Prevention and Control, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, 17 avenue, Po. Box 7162, Kigali, Rwanda.
Sabin NsanzimanaInstitute of HIV Disease Prevention and Control, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, 17 avenue, Po. Box 7162, Kigali, Rwanda.
Lutgarde LynenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo achieve the ambitious 90-90-90 UNAIDS targets, access to routine viral load (VL) is critical. To measure VL, Rwanda has relied on a national reference laboratory for years. In 2014, a VL testing platform was implemented in a rural District in the Northern Province. Here we analyze the uptake of VL testing, identification of risks for detectable VL (≥1000 copies/ml), and the management of patients with a detectable VL.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of patients who started ART between July 2012 and June 2015 and followed until end December 2016. Using descriptive statistics, we describe the VL cascade, from VL uptake to the start of second-line ART in patients diagnosed with virological failure. We estimate predictors of having a detectable VL using logistic regression.

resultsThe uptake of VL testing increased progressively between 2013 and 2016, raising from 25.6% (39/152) in 2013 up to 93.2% (510/547) in 2016.In 2016, 88.5% (n = 451) of patients tested, had a suppressed VL. Predictors of having a detectable VL included being male (aOR 2.1; 95%CI 1.12-4.02; p = 0.02), being a sex worker (aOR 6.4; 95%CI 1.1-36.0; p = 0.04), having a WHO clinical stage IV when starting ART (aOR 8.8; 95%CI 1.8-43.0; p < 0.001), having had a previous detectable VL (aOR 7.2; 95%CI 3.5-14.5; p < 0.001), and having had no VL before 2016 (aOR 3.1; 95%CI 1.2-8.1; p = 0.02). Among patients with initial detectable VL between 2013 and 2016, 88% (n = 103) had a follow-up VL, of whom 60.2% (n = 62) suppressed their VL below 1000 copies/ml. The median time between the initial and follow-up VL was of 12.5 months (IQR: 8.7-19.0). Among patients with confirmed treatment failure, 63.4% (n = 26) started second-line ART within the study period.

conclusionVL uptake increased after decentralizing VL testing in rural Rwanda. Virological suppression was high. An individualized follow up of patients at risk of non-suppression and a prompt management of patients with detectable VL may help to achieve and sustain the third global UNAIDS target: virological suppression in 90% of patients on ART.

Indexed as

Viral LoadAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRural PopulationAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-retroviral therapyDetectable viral loadviral loadviral suppression

Identifiers

PMID30606128
PMCPMC6318862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.