ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
NCLcomparator: systematically post-screening non-co-linear transcripts (circular, trans-spliced, or fusion RNAs) identified from various detectors.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in the detection and functional analysis of circRNAs with short-read RNA sequencing-based methods.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Circular RNA discovery with emerging sequencing and deep learning technologies.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Computational approaches and challenges in the analysis of circRNA data.BMC genomics · 2024Review
- New insight into circRNAs: characterization, strategies, and biomedical applications.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- Detecting intragenic trans-splicing events from non-co-linearly spliced junctions by hybrid sequencing.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Large-scale benchmarking of circRNA detection tools reveals large differences in sensitivity but not in precision.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Assessing the impacts of various factors on circular RNA reliability.Life science alliance · 2023Article
- CircMiMi: a stand-alone software for constructing circular RNA-microRNA-mRNA interactions across species.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Insights into circular RNAs: their biogenesis, detection, and emerging role in cardiovascular disease.RNA biology · 2021Review
- The bioinformatics toolbox for circRNA discovery and analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Insights Into the Role of CircRNAs: Biogenesis, Characterization, Functional, and Clinical Impact in Human Malignancies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Genome-wide, integrative analysis of circular RNA dysregulation and the corresponding circular RNA-microRNA-mRNA regulatory axes in autism.Genome research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-co-linear (NCL) transcripts consist of exonic sequences that are topologically inconsistent with the reference genome in an intragenic fashion (circular or intragenic trans-spliced RNAs) or in an intergenic fashion (fusion or intergenic trans-spliced RNAs). On the basis of RNA-seq data, numerous NCL event detectors have been developed and detected thousands of NCL events in diverse species. However, there are great discrepancies in the identification results among detectors, indicating a considerable proportion of false positives in the detected NCL events. Although several helpful guidelines for evaluating the performance of NCL event detectors have been provided, a systematic guideline for measurement of NCL events identified by existing tools has not been available.
resultsWe develop a software, NCLcomparator, for systematically post-screening the intragenic or intergenic NCL events identified by various NCL detectors. NCLcomparator first examine whether the input NCL events are potentially false positives derived from ambiguous alignments (i.e., the NCL events have an alternative co-linear explanation or multiple matches against the reference genome). To evaluate the reliability of the identified NCL events, we define the NCL score (NCL
conclusionNCLcomparator provides useful guidelines, with the input of identified NCL events from various detectors and the corresponding paired-end RNA-seq data only, to help users selecting potentially high-confidence NCL events for further functional investigation. The software thus helps to facilitate future studies into NCL events, shedding light on the fundamental biology of this important but understudied class of transcripts. NCLcomparator is freely accessible at https://github.com/TreesLab/NCLcomparator .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.