Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30605903›Full record

ReviewJournal of innate immunity2019

The Iron Tug-of-War between Bacterial Siderophores and Innate Immunity.

Rachel Golonka, Beng San Yeoh, Matam Vijay-Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of innate immunity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. TheMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Diet-vaccine interactions: SQM Iron andApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Metal uptake systems underpinInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Akkermansia muciniphila MucNature communications · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel GolonkaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Beng San YeohGraduate Program in Immunology and Infectious Disease, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Matam Vijay-KumarDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA, matamvijay.kumar@utoledo.edu.
University of Toledo · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Interplay between Dietary Fiber and Gut Microbiota in Hepatocellular CarcinomaR01CA219144 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI VIJAY-KUMAR, MATAM · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
Role of Lipocalin 2 Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseR01DK097865 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI VIJAY-KUMAR, MATAM · 2013 to 2015
$897k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK097865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron is necessary for the survival of almost all aerobic organisms. In the mammalian host, iron is a required cofactor for the assembly of functional iron-sulfur (Fe-S) cluster proteins, heme-binding proteins and ribonucleotide reductases that regulate various functions, including heme synthesis, oxygen transport and DNA synthesis. However, the bioavailability of iron is low due to its insolubility under aerobic conditions. Moreover, the host coordinates a nutritional immune response to restrict the accessibility of iron against potential pathogens. To counter nutritional immunity, most commensal and pathogenic bacteria synthesize and secrete small iron chelators termed siderophores. Siderophores have potent affinity for iron, which allows them to seize the essential metal from the host iron-binding proteins. To safeguard against iron thievery, the host relies upon the innate immune protein, lipocalin 2 (Lcn2), which could sequester catecholate-type siderophores and thus impede bacterial growth. However, certain bacteria are capable of outmaneuvering the host by either producing "stealth" siderophores or by expressing competitive antagonists that bind Lcn2 in lieu of siderophores. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms underlying the complex iron tug-of-war between host and bacteria with an emphasis on how host innate immunity responds to siderophores.

Indexed as

Host Microbial InteractionsImmunity, InnateCyclic GMPFerrous CompoundsHumansInflammationIronLipocalin-2NeutrophilsPeptidesReactive Oxygen SpeciesSiderophoresbis(3',5')-cyclic diguanylic acidCyclic GMPFerrous CompoundsIronLipocalin-2PeptidesReactive Oxygen SpeciessideromycinsSiderophoresDihydroxybenzoic acidEnterochelinNGALSiderocalin

Identifiers

PMID30605903
PMCPMC6487204
OpenAlexW2907850175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.