Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30605864›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy research2019

Informatics tools to assess the success of procedural harmonization in preclinical multicenter biomarker discovery study on post-traumatic epileptogenesis.

Robert Ciszek, Xavier Ekolle Ndode-Ekane, Cesar Santana Gomez, Pablo M Casillas-Espinosa, Idrish Ali, Gregory Smith, Noora Puhakka, Niina Lapinlampi, Pedro Andrade, Alaa Kamnaksh and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Robert CiszekA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. Electronic address: ciszek@uef.fi.
Xavier Ekolle Ndode-EkaneA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Cesar Santana GomezDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pablo M Casillas-EspinosaThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Idrish AliThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Gregory SmithDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Noora PuhakkaA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Niina LapinlampiA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Pedro AndradeA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Alaa KamnakshDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology and Genetics, Uniformed Services University, MD, USA.
Riikka ImmonenA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Tomi PaananenA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Matthew R HudsonThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Rhys D BradyThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Sandy R ShultzThe Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Terence J O'BrienDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia.
Richard J StabaDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jussi TohkaA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Asla PitkänenA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

The Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Antiepileptogenic Therapy (EpiBioS4Rx) Public Engagement CoreU54NS100064 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ENGEL, JEROME NONE, GALANOPOULOU, ARISTEA S · 2017 to 2021
$21.7M
NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS100064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Antiepileptogenic Therapy (EpiBioS4Rx) is a National Institutes for Neurological Diseases and Stoke funded Centers-Without-Walls international multidisciplinary study aimed at preventing epileptogenesis. The preclinical biomarker discovery in EpiBios4Rx applies a multicenter study design to allow the number of animals that are required for adequate statistical power for the analysis to be studied in an efficient manner. Further, the use of multiple centers mimics the clinical trial situation, and therefore potentially the chance of successful clinical translation of the outcomes of the study. Its successful implementation requires harmonization of procedures and data analyses between the three contributing centers in Finland, Australia, and USA. The objective of the present analysis was to develop metrics for analysis of the success of harmonization of procedures to guide further data analyses and plan the future multicenter preclinical studies. The interim analysis of data is based on the analysis of data from 212 rats with lateral fluid-percussion injury or sham-operation included in the biomarker discovery by April 30, 2018. The details of protocols, including production of injury, post-injury follow-up, blood sampling, electroencephalogram recording, and magnetic resonance imaging have been presented in the accompanying manuscripts in this Supplement. Implementation of protocols in EpiBios4Rx project participant centers was visualized in 2D using t-distributed stochastic neighborhood embedding (t-SNE). The protocols applied to each rat were presented as feature vectors of procedure related variables (e.g., impact pressure, anesthesia time). The total number of protocol features linked to each rat was 112. The missing data was accounted in visualization by utilizing imputation and adding the number of missing values as a third dimension to 2D t-SNE plot, resulting in a 3D overview of protocol data. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) using Euclidean distances and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of k-nearest neighbor classifier (KNN) were utilized to quantify the degree of clustering by center. Both subsets of data with incomplete protocol vectors omitted and missing protocol data imputed were assessed. Our data show that a visible clustering by center was observed in all t-SNE plots, except for day 7 neuroscores. Both ICC and AUC indicated clustering by center in all protocol variable subsets, excluding unimputed day 7 neuroscores (ICC 0.04 and AUC 0.6). ICC for imputed set of all protocol related variables was 0.1 and KNN AUC 0.92. In conclusion, both ICC and AUC indicated differences in protocol between EpiBios4Rx participating centers, which needs to be taken into account in data analysis. Importantly, the majority of observed differences are recoverable as they relate to insufficient updates in record keeping. While AUC score of KNN is a more sensitive measure for protocol harmonization than ICC for data that displays complex splintered clustering, ICC and AUC provide complementary measures to assess the degree of procedural harmonization. This experience should be helpful for other groups planning such multicenter post-traumatic epileptogenesis studies in the future.

Indexed as

BiomarkersComputational BiologyAlgorithmsAnimalsArea Under CurveBiomedical ResearchBrain Injuries, TraumaticElectroencephalographyEpilepsyFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternational CooperationMaleRatsStatistics, NonparametricBiomarkersClassificationCommon data elementDimensionality reductionIntraclass correlationk-nearest neighborLateral fluid-percussionMachine learningTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID30605864
PMCPMC6818710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.