Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30605475›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Alternative strategies for mosquito-borne arbovirus control.

Nicole L Achee, John P Grieco, Hassan Vatandoost, Gonçalo Seixas, Joao Pinto, Lee Ching-Ng, Ademir J Martins, Waraporn Juntarajumnong, Vincent Corbel, Clement Gouagna and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 162 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Transovarial transmission of mosquito-borne viruses: a systematic review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Research Trends and Collaborative Patterns inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Oviposition Deterrent and Larvicidal Activity ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nicole L AcheeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6939-2055
John P GriecoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Hassan VatandoostDepartment of Medical Entomology & Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Gonçalo SeixasGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Lisboa, Portugal.
Joao PintoGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Lisboa, Portugal.
Lee Ching-NgEnvironmental Health Institute (EHI), National Environment Agency (NEA), Singapore.
Ademir J MartinsInstituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Waraporn JuntarajumnongDepartment of Entomology, Kasetsart University (KU), Bangkok, Thailand.
Vincent CorbelInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Clement GouagnaInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Philippe DavidCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine (LECA), Université Grenoble-Alpes, Domaine universitaire de Saint Martin d'Hères, Grenoble, France.
James G LoganDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
James OrsborneDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Eric MaroisUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS UPR 9022, INSERM U963, Strasbourg, France.
Gregor J DevineQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
John VontasInstitute Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (IMBB), Foundation for Research and Technology (FORTH), Crete, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMosquito-borne viruses-such as Zika, chikungunya, dengue fever, and yellow fever, among others-are of global importance. Although vaccine development for prevention of mosquito-borne arbovirus infections has been a focus, mitigation strategies continue to rely on vector control. However, vector control has failed to prevent recent epidemics and arrest expanding geographic distribution of key arboviruses, such as dengue. As a consequence, there has been increasing necessity to further optimize current strategies within integrated approaches and advance development of alternative, innovative strategies for the control of mosquito-borne arboviruses. METHODS AND

findingsThis review, intended as a general overview, is one of a series being generated by the Worldwide Insecticide resistance Network (WIN). The alternative strategies discussed reflect those that are currently under evaluation for public health value by the World Health Organization (WHO) and represent strategies of focus by globally recognized public health stakeholders as potential insecticide resistance (IR)-mitigating strategies. Conditions where these alternative strategies could offer greatest public health value in consideration of mitigating IR will be dependent on the anticipated mechanism of action. Arguably, the most pressing need for endorsement of the strategies described here will be the epidemiological evidence of a public health impact.

conclusionsAs the burden of mosquito-borne arboviruses, predominately those transmitted by Aedes aegypti and A. albopictus, continues to grow at a global scale, new vector-control tools and integrated strategies will be required to meet public health demands. Decisions regarding implementation of alternative strategies will depend on key ecoepidemiological parameters that each is intended to optimally impact toward driving down arbovirus transmission.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsArbovirusesArbovirus InfectionsBiological Control AgentsInsecticide ResistanceInsecticidesMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsBiological Control AgentsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID30605475
PMCPMC6317787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.