Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30605250›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2019

CISDA: Changes in Integration for Social Decisions in Aging.

Ian Frazier, Nichole R Lighthall, Marilyn Horta, Eliany Perez, Natalie C Ebner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The preserved role of emotion prediction errors across adulthood.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. The Social Iowa Gambling Task: a promising tool for assessing deception detection in real-world contexts in adulthood.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Neither inaccurate nor biased in later life: Age-related differences in the accuracy and bias of facial trustworthiness judgment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Interoceptive Accuracy Enhances Deception Detection in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Age differences in the neural basis of decision-making under uncertainty.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Facial Trustworthiness Perception Across the Adult Life Span.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ian FrazierDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Nichole R LighthallDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
Marilyn HortaDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Eliany PerezDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Natalie C EbnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Funding

Research Training in Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Cognition in Aging, MCI, and Alzheimer's DiseaseT32AG020499 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MARSISKE, MICHAEL, SMITH, GLENN E. · 2003 to 2024
$3.7M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG020499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aging of our population has been accompanied by increasing concerns about older adults' vulnerability to violations of trust and a growing interest in normative age-related changes to decision making involving social partners. This intersection has spurred research on age-related neurocognitive and affective changes underlying social decision making. Based on our review and synthesis of this literature, we propose a specification that targets social decision making in aging to the recently proposed Affect-Integration-Motivation (AIM) framework. Our framework specification, Changes in Integration for Social Decisions in Aging (CISDA), emphasizes three key components of value integration with particular relevance for social decisions in aging: theory of mind, emotion regulation, and memory for past experience. CISDA builds on converging research from economic decision making, cognitive neuroscience, and lifespan development to outline how age-related changes to neurocognition and behavior impact social decision making. We conclude with recommendations for future research based on CISDA's predictions, including implications for the development of interventions to enhance social decision outcomes in older adults. This article is categorized under: Economics > Individual Decision Making Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making Psychology > Development and Aging Neuroscience > Cognition.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSocial BehaviorAgingCognitionEmotionsHumansMemoryModels, PsychologicalMotivationTheory of MindTrustaffectagingneurocognitionsocial decision making

Identifiers

PMID30605250
PMCPMC8142223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.