SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019
Early discontinuation of antibiotics for febrile neutropenia versus continuation until neutropenia resolution in people with cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07372131 (Appropriate Management of Bacteriemic Febrile Neutropenia in High-Risk Hematological Patients. Relationship Between Duration of Antibiotic Administration, Outcome and Resistance Profile), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Appropriate Management of Bacteriemic Febrile Neutropenia in High-Risk Hematological Patients. Relationship Between Duration of Antibiotic Administration, Outcome and Resistance Profile
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early discontinuation vs. continuation of empirical antibiotics in patients with cancer and febrile neutropenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Antibacterial prophylaxis in neutropenic fever: beyond fluoroquinolones.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Safety of short versus extended antibiotic therapy for neutropenic fever after hematopoietic cell transplantation.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- "The antibiotic paradox" in allogeneic stem cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Article
- Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship bundle on the outcome of high-risk neutropenic patients with fever: a pre-post study.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Article
- Factors influencing hospital length of stay in febrile neutropenia: A retrospective cohort study of Turkish patients with solid tumors.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Do We Need Meropenem Treatment Beyond 7 Days in Febrile Neutropenic Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Microbiome Modulation in Pediatric Leukemia: Impact on Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Optimization of Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy for Febrile Neutropenia in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the Management of Febrile Neutropenia in a Tertiary Care Center.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025Article
- Ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in HSCT recipients and acute leukemia patients post induction chemotherapy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Humoral Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-Boost in Cancer Patients: A Case Series from a Southern European Cancer Center.Vaccines · 2024Article
- Variation in Antibiotic Prescription in High-Risk Febrile Neutropenia in Portuguese Hospitals.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- "Better at home": Mixed methods report of intricacies in pediatric febrile neutropenia management.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Antimicrobial Stewardship on Patients with Neutropenia: A Narrative Review Commissioned by Microorganisms.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Review
- Internal evaluation of risk stratification tool using serial procalcitonin and clinical risk factors in pediatric febrile neutropenia: The non-interventional, single institution experience prior to clinical implementation.Pediatric hematology and oncology · 2023Article
- Identification of outcomes reported for hospital antimicrobial stewardship interventions using a systematic review of reviews.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2023Review
- Characterization of Febrile Neutropenia Management in Children With Malignancies: A Single-Center Evaluation.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with cancer with febrile neutropenia are at risk of severe infections and mortality and are thus treated empirically with broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. However, the recommended duration of antibiotic therapy differs across guidelines.
objectivesTo assess the safety of protocol-guided discontinuation of antibiotics regardless of neutrophil count, compared to continuation of antibiotics until neutropenia resolution in people with cancer with fever and neutropenia, in terms of mortality and morbidity. To assess the emergence of resistant bacteria in people with cancer treated with short courses of antibiotic therapy compared with people with cancer treated until resolution of neutropenia. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 10) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS up to 1 October 2018. We searched the metaRegister of Controlled Trials and the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing and unpublished trials. We reviewed the references of all identified studies for additional trials and handsearched conference proceedings of international infectious diseases and oncology and haematology conferences. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared a short antibiotic therapy course in which discontinuation of antibiotics was guided by protocols regardless of the neutrophil count to a long course in which antibiotics were continued until neutropenia resolution in people with cancer with febrile neutropenia. The primary outcome was 30-day or end of follow-up all-cause mortality. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently reviewed all studies for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias for all included trials. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) whenever possible. For dichotomous outcomes with zero events in both arms of the trials, we conducted meta-analysis of risk differences (RDs) as well. For continuous outcomes, we extracted means with standard deviations (SD) from the studies and computed mean difference (MD) and 95% CI. If no substantial clinical heterogeneity was found, trials were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model. MAIN
resultsWe included eight RCTs comprising a total of 662 distinct febrile neutropenia episodes. The studies included adults and children, and had variable design and criteria for discontinuation of antibiotics in both study arms. All included studies but two were performed before the year 2000. All studies included people with cancer with fever of unknown origin and excluded people with microbiological documented infections.We found no significant difference between the short-antibiotic therapy arm and the long-antibiotic therapy arm for all-cause mortality (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.62; RD 0.02, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.05; low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence to low due to imprecision and high risk of selection bias. The number of fever days was significantly lower for people in the short-antibiotic treatment arm compared to the long-antibiotic treatment arm (mean difference -0.64, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.32; I² = 30%). In all studies, total antibiotic days were fewer in the intervention arm by three to seven days compared to the long antibiotic therapy. We found no significant differences in the rates of clinical failure (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.77; very low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for clinical failure due to variable and inconsistent definitions of clinical failure across studies, possible selection bias, and wide confidence intervals. There was no significant difference in the incidence of bacteraemia occurring after randomisation (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.66; very low-certainty evidence), while the incidence of any documented infections was significantly higher in the short-antibiotic therapy arm (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.57). There was no significant difference in the incidence of invasive fungal infections (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.32 to 2.31) and development of antibiotic resistance (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.62 to 3.61). The data on hospital stay were too sparse to permit any meaningful conclusions. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe could make no strong conclusions on the safety of antibiotic discontinuation before neutropenia resolution among people with cancer with febrile neutropenia based on the existing evidence and its low certainty. Results of microbiological outcomes favouring long antibiotic therapy may be misleading due to lower culture positivity rates under antibiotic therapy and not true differences in infection rates. Well-designed, adequately powered RCTs are required that address this issue in the era of rising antibiotic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.