Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30605123›Full record

ReviewActa crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications2019

Single-particle reconstruction statistics: a diagnostic tool in solving biomolecular structures by cryo-EM.

J Bernard Heymann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. High resolution electron tomography and segmentation-by-modeling interpretation in Bsoft.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021
    Article
  6. Non-uniformity of projection distributions attenuates resolution in Cryo-EM.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Acta Crystallographica Section F - another home for cryo-electron microscopy contributions.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J Bernard HeymannLaboratory for Structural Biology Research, NIAMS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In single-particle analysis (SPA), the aim is to obtain a 3D reconstruction of a biological molecule from 2D electron micrographs to the highest level of detail or resolution as possible. Current practice is to collect large volumes of data, hoping to reach high-resolution maps through sheer numbers. However, adding more particles from a specific data set eventually leads to diminishing improvements in resolution. Understanding what these resolution limits are and how to deal with them are important in optimization and automation of SPA. This study revisits the theory of 3D reconstruction and demonstrates how the associated statistics can provide a diagnostic tool to improve SPA. Small numbers of images already give sufficient information on micrograph quality and the amount of data required to reach high resolution. Such feedback allows the microscopist to improve sample-preparation and imaging parameters before committing to extensive data collection. Once a larger data set is available, a B factor can be determined describing the suppression of the signal owing to one or more causes, such as specimen movement, radiation damage, alignment inaccuracy and structural variation. Insight into the causes of signal suppression can then guide the user to consider appropriate actions to obtain better reconstructions.

Indexed as

Algorithmsbeta-GalactosidaseCryoelectron MicroscopyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalSignal-To-Noise RatioSoftwarebeta-Galactosidasecryo-electron microscopycryo-EMFourier shell correlationimage processingsingle-particle analysisspectral signal-to-noise ratio

Identifiers

PMID30605123
PMCPMC6317460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.