Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30604983›Full record

ArticlePersonality disorders2019

Health risk prediction models incorporating personality data: Motivation, challenges, and illustration.

Benjamin P Chapman, Feng Lin, Shumita Roy, Ralph H B Benedict, Jeffrey M Lyness

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personality disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Non-Invasive Cancer Detection Using Blood Test and Predictive Modeling Approach.Advances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin P ChapmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0002-5170-3131
Feng LinDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0003-1945-0362
Shumita RoyDepartment of Neurology, University at Buffalo Medical Center.
Ralph H B BenedictDepartment of Neurology, University at Buffalo Medical Center.
Jeffrey M LynessDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center.

Funding

LATE LIFE DEPRESSION OUTCOME &MEDICAL ILLNESS SEVERITYR01MH061429 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI LYNESS, JEFFREY M · 2001 to 2005
$2.7M
Fragile X-associated Tremor/Ataxia SyndromeR01AG024488 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HAGERMAN, PAUL J · 2005 to 2009
$1.8M
Personality-Epidemiologic Research on Inequalities in LongevityR01AG042582 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CHAPMAN, BENJAMIN P · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG024488NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042582NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The age of "big data" in health has ushered in an era of prediction models promising to forecast individual health events. Although many models focus on enhancing the predictive power of medical risk factors with genomic data, a recent proposal is to augment traditional health predictors with psychosocial data, such as personality measures. In this article we provide a general overview of the medical risk prediction models and then discuss the rationale for integrating personality data. We suggest three principles that should guide work in this area if personality data is ultimately to be useful within risk prediction as it is actually practiced in the health care system. These include (a) prediction of specific, priority health outcomes; (b) sufficient incremental validity beyond established biomedical risk factors; and (c) technically responsible model-building that does not overfit the data. We then illustrate the application of these principles in the development of a personality-augmented prediction model for the occurrence of mild cognitive impairment, designed for a primary care setting. We evaluate the results, drawing conclusions for the direction an iterative, programmatic approach would need to take to eventually achieve clinical utility. Although there is great potential for personality measurement to play a key role in the coming era of risk prediction models, the final section reviews the many challenges that must be faced in real-world implementation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

PersonalityPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30604983
PMCPMC6319275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.