Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30604930›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reports2019

Pacemaking in cardiac tissue. From IK2 to a coupled-clock system.

Edward Carmeliet

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. RyR2 and Calcium Release in Heart Failure.Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  11. hiPSC-Derived Cardiac Tissue for Disease Modeling and Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Cardiac effects and toxicity of chloroquine: a short update.International journal of antimicrobial agents · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edward CarmelietKatholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initially, diastolic depolarization in Purkinje fibers was explained by deactivation of gK2 in the presence of inward current. Weakness of the hypothesis was a too negative reversal potential, sensitivity to external Na

Indexed as

Biological ClocksMembrane PotentialsAnimalsHeart RateHumansMyocardial ContractionMyocytes, CardiacPotassium ChannelsPotassium ChannelsBiological pacemakerconductionionic theorypatch

Identifiers

PMID30604930
PMCPMC6317064
OpenAlexW2908349485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.