Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30604769›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Transposable elements are regulated by context-specific patterns of chromatin marks in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Jiangping He, Xiuling Fu, Meng Zhang, Fangfang He, Wenjuan Li, Mazid Md Abdul, Jianguo Zhou, Li Sun, Chen Chang, Yuhao Li and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How Early-Life Programming During Embryogenesis Imprints Cellular Memory.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. PRMT5 activity sustains histone production to maintain genome integrity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiangping HeKey Laboratory of Regenerative Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510530, Guangzhou, China.
Xiuling FuDepartment of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, 1088 Xueyuan Lu, 518055, Shenzhen, China.
Meng ZhangKey Laboratory of Regenerative Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510530, Guangzhou, China.
Fangfang HeDepartment of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, 1088 Xueyuan Lu, 518055, Shenzhen, China.
Wenjuan LiJoint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University and Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 511436, Guangzhou, China.
Mazid Md AbdulKey Laboratory of Regenerative Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510530, Guangzhou, China.
Jianguo ZhouKey Laboratory of Regenerative Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510530, Guangzhou, China.
Li SunDepartment of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, 1088 Xueyuan Lu, 518055, Shenzhen, China.
Chen ChangDepartment of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, 1088 Xueyuan Lu, 518055, Shenzhen, China.
Yuhao LiDepartment of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, 1088 Xueyuan Lu, 518055, Shenzhen, China.
He LiuKey Laboratory of Regenerative Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510530, Guangzhou, China.
Kaixin WuKey Laboratory of Regenerative Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510530, Guangzhou, China.
Isaac A BabarindeDepartment of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, 1088 Xueyuan Lu, 518055, Shenzhen, China.
Qiang ZhuangDepartment of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, 1088 Xueyuan Lu, 518055, Shenzhen, China.
Yuin-Han LohEpigenetics and Cell Fates Laboratory, A*STAR Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 61 Biopolis Drive, Proteos, Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Jiekai ChenKey Laboratory of Regenerative Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510530, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5168-7074
Miguel A EstebanKey Laboratory of Regenerative Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510530, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1426-6809
Andrew P HutchinsDepartment of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, 1088 Xueyuan Lu, 518055, Shenzhen, China. andrewh@sustc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7784-2255
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNSouthern University of Science and Technology · CNAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGGuangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health · CNNankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of mammalian genomes are devoted to transposable elements (TEs). Whilst TEs are increasingly recognized for their important biological functions, they are a potential danger to genomic stability and are carefully regulated by the epigenetic system. However, the full complexity of this regulatory system is not understood. Here, using mouse embryonic stem cells, we show that TEs are suppressed by heterochromatic marks like H3K9me3, and are also labelled by all major types of chromatin modification in complex patterns, including bivalent activatory and repressive marks. We identified 29 epigenetic modifiers that significantly deregulated at least one type of TE. The loss of Setdb1, Ncor2, Rnf2, Kat5, Prmt5, Uhrf1, and Rrp8 caused widespread changes in TE expression and chromatin accessibility. These effects were context-specific, with different chromatin modifiers regulating the expression and chromatin accessibility of specific subsets of TEs. Our work reveals the complex patterns of epigenetic regulation of TEs.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCell LineChromatinDNA MethylationDNA Transposable ElementsGene Knockdown TechniquesHistone CodeHistonesMiceMouse Embryonic Stem CellsChromatinDNA Transposable ElementsHistones

Identifiers

PMID30604769
PMCPMC6318327
OpenAlexW2914573130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.