Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30604631›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2019

Imaging in myeloma with focus on advanced imaging techniques.

Tara Barwick, Laure Bretsztajn, Kathryn Wallitt, Dimitri Amiras, Andrea Rockall, Christina Messiou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. PET in myeloma redefined: a comparative imaging study with FDG and fluorocholine PET/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tara Barwick1 Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK.
Laure Bretsztajn1 Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK.
Kathryn Wallitt1 Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK.
Dimitri Amiras1 Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK.
Andrea Rockall1 Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK.
Christina Messiou3 The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.

Funding

Department of Health EME/16/68/34
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there have been major advances in the imaging of myeloma with whole body MRI incorporating diffusion-weighted imaging, emerging as the most sensitive modality. Imaging is now a key component in the work-up of patients with a suspected diagnosis of myeloma. The International Myeloma Working Group now specifies that more than one focal lesion on MRI or lytic lesion on whole body low-dose CT or fludeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT fulfil the criteria for bone damage requiring therapy. The recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence myeloma guidelines recommend imaging in all patients with suspected myeloma. In addition, there is emerging data supporting the use of functional imaging techniques (WB-DW MRI and FDG PET/CT) to predict outcome and evaluate response to therapy. This review summarises the imaging modalities used in myeloma, the latest guidelines relevant to imaging and future directions.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple MyelomaPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPractice Guidelines as TopicTomography, X-Ray ComputedWhole Body ImagingFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID30604631
PMCPMC6540859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.