Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30604623›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019

The split sign: The MRI equivalent of the bell clapper deformity.

Bunta Tokuda, Maki Kiba, Kaori Yamada, Hitomi Nagano, Hiroshi Miura, Mariko Goto, Kei Yamada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bunta Tokuda1 Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine , Kyoto , Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9725-0687
Maki Kiba1 Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine , Kyoto , Japan.
Kaori Yamada1 Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine , Kyoto , Japan.
Hitomi Nagano1 Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine , Kyoto , Japan.
Hiroshi Miura1 Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine , Kyoto , Japan.
Mariko Goto1 Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine , Kyoto , Japan.
Kei Yamada1 Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine , Kyoto , Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methods: The cases of eight patients who underwent MRI and surgery for acute scrotum between January 2010 and January 2017 were evaluated. We recorded whether hyperintense fluid on T

results: In one patient without hydrocele, readers were unable to evaluate the anatomy of the tunica vaginalis. Among seven patients with hydrocele, five had the split sign and all were surgically confirmed as BCD. In two patients with hydrocele but no split sign, one had normal scrotal anatomy and the other had a BCD with a necrotic testis adherent to the scrotal wall.

conclusion: The split sign on MRI corresponded well to the lack of fixation of the epididymis to the scrotal wall and detected BCD with high sensitivity (5/6). ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: A hyperintense area on T

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective StudiesScrotumSensitivity and SpecificitySpermatic Cord TorsionTesticular DiseasesTestisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30604623
PMCPMC6541176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.