Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30604393›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Contrast enhancing spots as a new pattern of late onset pseudoprogression in glioma patients.

Martin Voss, Kea Franz, Joachim P Steinbach, Emmanouil Fokas, Marie-Thérèse Forster, Katharina Filipski, Elke Hattingen, Marlies Wagner, Stella Breuer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martin VossDr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. martin.voss@kgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8469-8204
Kea FranzDepartement of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Joachim P SteinbachDr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Emmanouil FokasDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marie-Thérèse ForsterDepartement of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Katharina FilipskiInstitut of Neurology (Edinger-Institute), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Elke HattingenDepartement of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marlies WagnerDepartement of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Stella BreuerDepartement of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMagnet resonance imaging (MRI) of gliomas is assessed by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria (RANO), which define new contrast-enhancing lesions as a sign for tumor recurrence. Pseudoprogression after radiotherapy may mimic tumor progression in MRI but is usually limited to the first months after irradiation. We noted a late onset pattern of new contrast-enhancing spots (NCES) appearing years after radiotherapy.

methodsWe prospectively collected 23 glioma patients with 26 NCES (three patients had two separate NCES events) between 2014 and 2016 in our weekly tumor board without further selection by diagnosis, molecular markers or pretreatment.

resultsRetrospective analysis revealed a homogeneous collective of young patients (median age of 49 years at NCES) with mainly IDH-mutated glioma (61%). Initial histology showed 26% glioblastoma, 52% grade III and 22% grade II glioma. NCES occurred at late follow-up with a median of 52 months after tumor diagnosis and 30 months after the last radiotherapy. The majority of NCES regressed spontaneously within a median of 10 months (n = 11) or remained stable without further therapy with a median follow-up of 26 months (n = 7). Only 4 NCES developed MRI morphologically into tumor recurrence. Two NCES were resected without any histopathological proof of tumor recurrence, and in 2 other cases NCES were defined as ischemic stroke or radionecrosis.

conclusionWe hypothesize that the late onset phenomenon of NCES predominantly represents a form of radiation-induced vasculopathy that is different from early pseudoprogression and should be considered especially in younger patients with IDH-mutated glioma before initiation of new therapy.

Indexed as

AdultBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleGliomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBrain tumorGliomaIsocitrat dehydrogenase (IDH)PseudoprogressionRadionecrosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.