Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30604241›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2019

Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Wilms Tumor: An Update.

Radna Minou Oostveen, Kathy Pritchard-Jones

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Clinical effect of multicenter multidisciplinary treatment in children with renal malignant tumors].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mitocanic Di- and Triterpenoid Rhodamine B Conjugates.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  12. Rare anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. EV PD-L1 Contributes to Immunosuppressive CD8Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Radna Minou OostveenUCL Great Ormond Street Hospital Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. m.oostveen@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9674-8870
Kathy Pritchard-JonesUCL Great Ormond Street Hospital Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2384-9475

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17297Cancer Research UK C1188/A4614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although differences exist in treatment and risk-stratification strategies for children with Wilms tumor (WT) between the European [International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP)] and American [Children's Oncology Group (COG)] study groups, outcomes are very similar, with an overall survival of > 85%. Future strategies aim to de-intensify treatment and reduce toxicity for children with a low risk of relapse and intensify treatment for children with high-risk disease. For metastatic WT, response of lung nodules to chemotherapy is used as a marker to modify treatment intensity. For recurrent WT, a unified approach based on the use of agents that were not used for primary therapy is being introduced. Irinotecan is being explored as a new strategy in both metastatic and relapsed WT. Introduction of biology-driven approaches to risk stratification and new drug treatments has been slower in WT than in some other childhood cancers. While several new biological pathways have been identified recently in WT, their individual rarity has hampered their translation into clinical utility. Identification of robust prognostic factors requires extensive international collaborative studies because of the low proportion who relapse or die. Molecular profiling studies are in progress that should ultimately improve both risk classification and signposting to more targeted therapies for the small group for whom current therapies fail. Accrual of patients with WT to early-phase trials has been low, and the efficacy of these new agents has so far been very disappointing. Better in vitro model systems to test mechanistic dependence are needed so available new agents can be more rationally prioritized for recruitment of children with WT to early-phase trials.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsChildDrug TherapyHumansKidney NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingWilms TumorAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.