Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30604200›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2019

Botulinum neurotoxin a therapy efficacy and safety for oromandibular dystonia: a meta-analysis.

Pariessa D Dadgardoust, Raymond L Rosales, Ria Monica Asuncion, Dirk Dressler

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Obstructive sleep apnea due to oromandibular dystonia and treated with botulinum toxin.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Treatment of dystonia and tics.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pariessa D DadgardoustDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines. pariessa@yahoo.com.
Raymond L RosalesDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Ria Monica AsuncionDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Dirk DresslerMovement Disorders Section, Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
University of Santo Tomas Hospital · PHMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oromandibular dystonia (OMD) is a focal dystonia involving the mouth, jaw, and tongue. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) therapy might be one form of treatment in OMD. Systematic pooling of BoNT studies in OMD remains wanting, as the derived data could provide useful information in regard to efficacy and safety issues. This meta-analysis determined the effects of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) on the reduction of dystonic movement and its safety among patients with OMD. A systematic search of the literature that met the following eligibility criteria were done: (1) patients treated with BoNT/A for OMD, (2) studies of high methodological quality and (3) outcome criteria specified as regard to efficacy. Risk of unresolved dystonia was computed before and after BoNT/A intervention. Random effect size (p < 0.05ɑ) and test of heterogeneity (< I2 50%) were computed as meta-analysis tool using REVMAN ver 5.3 program. Safety data, where available, were systematically reviewed. Nine studies involved 387 cases in total of OMD. The pooled risk ratio is 0.607 with a confidence interval of 0.371-0.783, a z value of 3.85, and a p value of 0.0001. Results indicate that risk of dystonic movements is lower by 39.30% in the treatment group than in the control group. A total of 105/387 patients (27.1%) experienced adverse events most commonly dysphagia. Whilst cited literatures have inherent weaknesses, results show that BoNT/A is efficacious in reducing dystonic movements of patients with OMD. Majority of studies employed electromyography (EMG) guidance in muscle targeting. Given the potential adverse event of dysphagia, one may take a cautious stand while delivering injections to target muscles. These findings are congruent with what has been published in regard to efficacy of BoNT/A in focal dystonia.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ADeglutition DisordersDystonic DisordersHumansJaw DiseasesMouth DiseasesNeuromuscular AgentsOutcome Assessment, Health CareBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular AgentsBotulinum toxinBotulinum toxin ALingual dystoniaOromandibular dystoniaPerioral dystoniaTherapy

Identifiers

PMID30604200
OpenAlexW2906971829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.