Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30604164›Full record

ArticleClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2020

The Orthostatic Discriminant and Severity Scale (ODSS): an assessment of orthostatic intolerance.

Jacquie Baker, Justin R Paturel, David M Sletten, Phillip A Low, Kurt Kimpinski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessment of comorbid symptoms in pediatric autonomic dysfunction.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jacquie BakerDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Rm B7-140B, University Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada. jbaker62@alumni.uwo.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2346-2761
Justin R PaturelDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Rm B7-140B, University Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada.
David M SlettenDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Phillip A LowDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kurt KimpinskiDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Rm B7-140B, University Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the ability of the Orthostatic Discriminant and Severity Scale (ODSS) to distinguish symptoms of orthostatic intolerance from non-orthostatic symptoms.

methodsClinical evaluations and questionnaire responses were collected in 73 healthy controls and 132 patients referred to the Autonomic Disorders Clinic from September 1, 2016, through April 30, 2018, for queries regarding autonomic dysfunction. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to interpret sensitivity and specificity and to determine cutoff scores for symptom assessment. Inter-item reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. To calculate positive and negative predictive powers, patient data were collected in a single-blinded fashion where the researcher collecting questionnaire data was blinded to the clinical evaluation and diagnosis. Predictive powers were calculated using a chi-squared cross-tabulation.

resultsThe orthostatic and non-orthostatic symptoms scores produced ROC curves with an area under the curve of 0.89 and 0.79, respectively. The orthostatic scores yielded a positive and negative predictive power value of 73% and 81%, respectively. Combined, the ODSS identified patients with and without orthostatic symptoms with an overall accuracy of 76%. The reliability of the ODSS was significant, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.88, and all dichotomous items were deemed worthy of retention following an inter-item reliability assessment.

conclusionsThe ODSS demonstrated a strong ability to distinguish patients with and without orthostatic intolerance and demonstrated sensitivity and specificity equivalent to that of other standardized measures. Overall, the ODSS produces symptom scores that are both reliable and useful for both research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrthostatic IntolerancePostureSingle-Blind MethodSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAutonomic dysfunctionAutonomic reflex screenOrthostatic intoleranceQuestionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.