ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2019
Improved compressed sensing reconstruction for
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systems Engineering Approach Towards Sensitive Cellular Fluorine-19 MRI.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Enhanced detection of paramagnetic fluorine-19 magnetic resonance imaging agents using zero echo time sequence and compressed sensing.NMR in biomedicine · 2022Article
- Prognostic Value of Fluorine-19 MRI Oximetry Monitoring in cancer.Molecular imaging and biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), compressed sensing (CS) enables the reconstruction of undersampled sparse data sets. Thus, partial acquisition of the underlying k-space data is sufficient, which significantly reduces measurement time. While MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo resampling strategies in combination with CS reconstructions are presented. Numerical simulations are performed for low-SNR spatially sparse data obtained from
resultsAn improvement in overall image quality compared to conventional CS reconstructions was observed for both strategies. Specifically spike artifacts in the background were suppressed, while the changes in signal pixels remained small. DISCUSSION: The proposed methods improve the quality of CS reconstructions. Furthermore, because resampling is applied during post-processing, no additional measurement time is required. This allows easy incorporation into existing protocols and application to already measured data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30604144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.