Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30604143›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019

Segmentation of the proximal femur in radial MR scans using a random forest classifier and deformable model registration.

Dimitrios Damopoulos, Till Dominic Lerch, Florian Schmaranzer, Moritz Tannast, Christophe Chênes, Guoyan Zheng, Jérôme Schmid

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Automated atlas-based segmentation for skull base surgical planning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dimitrios DamopoulosInstitute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014, Bern, Switzerland. dimitrios.damopoulos@istb.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6664-0700
Till Dominic LerchDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Florian SchmaranzerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Moritz TannastDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Christophe ChênesSchool of Health Sciences - Geneva, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Avenue de Champel 47, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland.
Guoyan ZhengInstitute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014, Bern, Switzerland. guoyan.zheng@istb.unibe.ch.
Jérôme SchmidSchool of Health Sciences - Geneva, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Avenue de Champel 47, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 205321_163224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadial 2D MRI scans of the hip are routinely used for the diagnosis of the cam type of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head, both considered causes of hip joint osteoarthritis in young and active patients. A method for automated and accurate segmentation of the proximal femur from radial MRI scans could be very useful in both clinical routine and biomechanical studies. However, to our knowledge, no such method has been published before. PURPOSE: The aims of this study are the development of a system for the segmentation of the proximal femur from radial MRI scans and the reconstruction of its 3D model that can be used for diagnosis and planning of hip-preserving surgery.

methodsThe proposed system relies on: (a) a random forest classifier and (b) the registration of a 3D template mesh of the femur to the radial slices based on a physically based deformable model. The input to the system are the radial slices and the manually specified positions of three landmarks. Our dataset consists of the radial MRI scans of 25 patients symptomatic of FAI or AVN and accompanying manual segmentation of the femur, treated as the ground truth.

resultsThe achieved segmentation of the proximal femur has an average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 96.37 ± 1.55%, an average symmetric mean absolute distance (SMAD) of 0.94 ± 0.39 mm and an average Hausdorff distance of 2.37 ± 1.14 mm. In the femoral head subregion, the average SMAD is 0.64 ± 0.18 mm and the average Hausdorff distance is 1.41 ± 0.56 mm.

conclusionsWe validated a semiautomated method for the segmentation of the proximal femur from radial MR scans. A 3D model of the proximal femur is also reconstructed, which can be used for the planning of hip-preserving surgery.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsAutomationFemaleFemoracetabular ImpingementFemurFemur HeadHip JointHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, Hip3D reconstructionDeformable modelProximal femurRadial imaging of the hipRandom forestSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID30604143
OpenAlexW2907382222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.