Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30604048›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2019

Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.

John G Samuelsson, Sheraz Khan, Padmavathi Sundaram, Noam Peled, Matti S Hämäläinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John G SamuelssonHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (HST), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. johnsam@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6996-1251
Sheraz KhanAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Padmavathi SundaramAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Noam PeledAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Matti S HämäläinenAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Harvard University · US

Funding

Project 4P41EB015896 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2018
$9.8M
Neuroimaging Training ProgramT32EB001680 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BRUCE R ROSEN · 2003 to 2026
$3.8M
CRCNS: Advancing Computational Methods to Reveal Human Thalamocortical DynamicsR01MH106174 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI HAMALAINEN, MATTI, JONES, STEPHANIE RUGGIANO · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015896NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001680NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) use non-invasive sensors to detect neural currents. Since the contribution of superficial neural sources to the measured M/EEG signals are orders-of-magnitude stronger than the contribution of subcortical sources, most MEG and EEG studies have focused on cortical activity. Subcortical structures, however, are centrally involved in both healthy brain function as well as in many neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. In this paper, we present a method that can separate and suppress the cortical signals while preserving the subcortical contributions to the M/EEG data. The resulting signal subspace of the data mainly originates from subcortical structures. Our method works by utilizing short-baseline planar gradiometers with short-sighted sensitivity distributions as reference sensors for cortical activity. Since the method is completely data-driven, forward and inverse modeling are not required. In this study, we use simulations and auditory steady state response experiments in a human subject to demonstrate that the method can remove the cortical signals while sparing the subcortical signals. We also test our method on MEG data recorded in an essential tremor patient with a deep brain stimulation implant and show how it can be used to reduce the DBS artifact in the MEG data by ~ 99.9% without affecting low frequency brain rhythms.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAlgorithmsArtifactsBrainCerebral CortexComputer SimulationDeep Brain StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedElectroencephalographyEssential TremorEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHumansMagnetoencephalographyModels, NeurologicalSignal-To-Noise RatioElectroencephalographyMagnetoencephalographySignal processingSpatial filteringSubcortical imagingTemporal subspace projection

Identifiers

PMID30604048
PMCPMC6374174
OpenAlexW2906743803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.