Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30603862›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019

The Dilemma of the Dilated Main Pancreatic Duct in the Distal Pancreatic Remnant After Proximal Pancreatectomy for IPMN.

Rachel E Simpson, Eugene P Ceppa, Howard H Wu, Fatih Akisik, Michael G House, Nicholas J Zyromski, Attila Nakeeb, Mohammad A Al-Haddad, John M DeWitt, Stuart Sherman and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Should non-invasive diffuse main-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms be treated with total pancreatectomy?HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel E SimpsonDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 129, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Eugene P CeppaDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 129, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Howard H WuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Fatih AkisikDepartment of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Michael G HouseDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 129, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Nicholas J ZyromskiDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 129, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Attila NakeebDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 129, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Mohammad A Al-HaddadIndiana University Health Pancreatic Cyst and Cancer Early Detection Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
John M DeWittDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Stuart ShermanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
C Max SchmidtDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 129, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. maxschmi@iupui.edu.
Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): A dilated main pancreatic duct in the distal remnant after proximal pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) poses a diagnostic dilemma. We sought to determine parameters predictive of remnant main-duct IPMN and malignancy during surveillance.

methodsThree hundred seventeen patients underwent proximal pancreatectomy for IPMN (Indiana University, 1991-2016). Main-duct dilation included those ≥ 5 mm or "dilated" on radiographic reports. Statistics compared groups using Student's T/Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables or chi-square/Fisher's exact test for categorical variables with P < 0.05 considered significant.

resultsHigh-grade/invasive IPMN or adenocarcinoma at proximal pancreatectomy predicted malignant outcomes (100.0% malignant outcomes; P < 0.001) in remnant surveillance. Low/moderate-grade lesions revealed benign outcomes at last surveillance regardless of duct diameter. Twenty of 21 patients undergoing distal remnant reoperation had a dilated main duct. Seven had main-duct IPMN on remnant pathology; these patients had greater mean maximum main-duct diameter prior to reoperation (9.5 vs 6.2 mm, P = 0.072), but this did not reach statistical significance. Several features showed high sensitivity/specificity for remnant main-duct IPMN.

conclusionsRemnant main-duct dilation after proximal pancreatectomy for IPMN remains a diagnostic dilemma. Several parameters show a promise in accurately diagnosing main-duct IPMN in the remnant.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsAdenocarcinoma, MucinousCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDilatation, PathologicHumansPancreasPancreatectomyPancreatic DuctsPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsReoperationRetrospective StudiesMucinous neoplasmsPancreatic cystPancreatic ductPancreatic neoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID30603862
OpenAlexW2907232546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.