Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30603523›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2017

Regenerative Potential of Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) for Curing Intrabony Periodontal Defects: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.

Shariq Najeeb, Zohaib Khurshid, Muhammad Atif Saleem Agwan, Shazia Akhbar Ansari, Muhammad Sohail Zafar, Jukka Pekka Matinlinna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Autogenous Tooth Bone Grafts for Repair and Regeneration of Maxillofacial Defects: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Biomimetic Aspects of Restorative Dentistry Biomaterials.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shariq NajeebRestorative Dental Sciences Department, Al-Farabi Colleges, Riyadh, 11313 Saudi Arabia.
Zohaib Khurshid2Biomedical Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B9 Canada.
Muhammad Atif Saleem Agwan3Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Buraidah, 51452 Saudi Arabia.
Shazia Akhbar Ansari4Department of Oral Microbiology, Dow Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Mission Road, Karachi, 74200 Pakistan.
Muhammad Sohail Zafar5Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al-Hezam Street, Al Madinah Al Munawwarah, 41311 Saudi Arabia.
Jukka Pekka Matinlinna7Department of Dental Materials Science, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has been used in regenerative medicine and dentistry. Recently, its use has been advocated for regenerative periodontics and wound healing. The randomized control trials have assessed the regenerative efficacy of the PRF for restoring intrabony periodontal defects. The objectives are to critically analyze and appraise the currently available literature, focusing on the use of PRF in regenerating periodontal bone defects. An electronic search was conducted (PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ISI-WOS). Various combinations of following keywords were used: 'platelet-rich fibrin', 'intrabony', 'periodontal', 'bone defect' and 'guided tissue regeneration'. A secondary search was conducted by analyzing the reference lists of the articles obtained in initial search. The final search resulted in 13 randomized controlled trials being included. In majority of studies, PRF resulted in better clinical/radiographic outcomes than open flap debridement and augmented therapeutic effects of bone grafts. The combination of bovine bone substitutes and PRF resulted in better performance compared to alone. Similarly better outcomes were observed while using PRF in combination with nanohydroxyapatite, metformin and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. It can be concluded that PRF produces better outcomes than open flap debridement alone and augments the regenerative effects of bone substitutes.

Indexed as

FibrinIntrabony defectsPeriodontalRegenerationTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID30603523
PMCPMC6171661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.