ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2017
Adult Stem Cells of Orofacial Origin: Current Knowledge and Limitation and Future Trend in Regenerative Medicine.
Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A proof-of-concept for a novel mandibular dental implant model in mice.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Effect of Bioactive Glass into Mineral Trioxide Aggregate on the Biocompatibility and Mineralization Potential of Dental Pulp Stem Cells.Biomaterials research · 2025Article
- Functional screening of amplification outlier oncogenes in organoid models of early tumorigenesis.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Promote Wound Healing Through the WNT/β-catenin Signaling Pathway in Dermal Fibroblasts.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Article
- Single-cell characterization of monolayer cultured human dental pulp stem cells with enhanced differentiation capacity.International journal of oral science · 2021Article
- Tracking of Oral and Craniofacial Stem Cells in Tissue Development, Regeneration, and Diseases.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021Review
- A Living Cell Repository of the Cranio-/Orofacial Region to Advance Research and Promote Personalized Medicine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Human Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Endogenous Bone Regeneration.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Review
- Adipose Stem Cells with Conditioned Media for Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Scar.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stem cell research is one of the most rapidly expanding field of medicine which provides significant opportunities for therapeutic and regenerative applications. Different types of stem cells have been isolated investigating their accessibility, control of the differentiation pathway and additional immunomodulatory properties. Bulk of the literature focus has been on the study and potential applications of adult stem cells (ASC) because of their low immunogenicity and reduced ethical considerations. This review paper summarizes the basic available literature on different types of ASC with special focus on stem cells from dental and orofacial origin. ASC have been isolated from different sources, however, isolation of ASC from orofacial tissues has provided a novel promising alternative. These cells offer a great potential in the future of therapeutic and regenerative medicine because of their remarkable availability at low cost while allowing minimally invasive isolation procedures. Furthermore, their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory potential is of particular interest. However, there are conflicting reports in the literature regarding their particular biology and full clinical potentials. Sound knowledge and higher control over proliferation and differentiation mechanisms are prerequisites for clinical applications of these cells. Therefore, further standardized basic and translational studies are required to increase the reproducibility and reduce the controversies of studies, which in turn facilitate comparison of related literature and enhance further development in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.