ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2017
Biological Interaction Between Human Gingival Fibroblasts and Vascular Endothelial Cells for Angiogenesis: A Co-culture Perspective.
Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- State-of the-art and future perspective in co-culture systems for tendon engineering.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Development of fibroblast/endothelial cell-seeded collagen scaffolds for in vitro prevascularization.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2023Article
- Oral mucositis on a chip: modeling induction by chemo- and radiation treatments and recovery.Biofabrication · 2022Article
- Oral mucosa equivalents, prevascularization approaches, and potential applications.Connective tissue research · 2022Review
- Use of Human Gingival Fibroblasts for Pre-Vascularization Strategies in Oral Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Article
- Vascularization strategies in tissue engineering approaches for soft tissue repair.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2021Review
- A Review of Biomaterials and Scaffold Fabrication for Organ-on-a-Chip (OOAC) Systems.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Optimization of Microenvironments Inducing Differentiation of Tonsil-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells into Endothelial Cell-Like Cells.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2019Article
- Fibroblasts as an experimental model system for the study of comparative physiology.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancement in cell culture protocols, multidisciplinary research approach, and the need of clinical implication to reconstruct damaged or diseased tissues has led to the establishment of three-dimensional (3D) test systems for regeneration and repair. Regenerative therapies, including dental tissue engineering, have been pursued as a new prospect to repair and rebuild the diseased/lost oral tissues. Interactions between the different cell types, growth factors, and extracellular matrix components involved in angiogenesis are vital in the mechanisms of new vessel formation for tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.