ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2017
Dental Pulp Stem Cells: Current Advances in Isolation, Expansion and Preservation.
Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biopolymer-Based 3D Printing for Dental-Pulp Complex Tissue Regeneration: Innovations and Challenges.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Applications of Neural Regeneration Through Dental Pulp Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Optimizing neurogenic differentiation of dental stem cells: a critical review of induction strategies and functional validation.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- NMR metabolomics assessment of neural commitment of human dental pulp-derived stem cells.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells Expressing BMP2/7 Heterodimers in a Doxycycline-Inducible Manner.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Engineered Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells with Promising Potential for Regenerative Medicine.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Review
- Validated methods for isolation and qualification of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells from different sources.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Effect of the pulp harvesting method on the viability of human dental pulp stem cells and their odontogenic differentiation potential.Cell and tissue banking · 2025Article
- Characterization of Fibronectin-Adherent, Non-Fibronectin-Adherent, and Explant-Derived Human Dental Pulp Stem Cell Populations.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Review
- Analogies and Differences Between Dental Stem Cells: Focus on Secretome in Combination with Scaffolds in Neurological Disorders.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- Long-term passage impacts human dental pulp stem cell activities and cell response to drug additionPeerJ · 2024Article
- Research progress on optimization ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Review
- Molecules Inducing Dental Stem Cells Differentiation and Bone Regeneration: State of the Art.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Gangliosides and Their Role in Multilineage Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Dental Pulp Stem Cell Heterogeneity: Finding Superior Quality "Needles" in a Dental Pulpal "Haystack" for Regenerative Medicine-Based Applications.Stem cells international · 2022Review
- Isolation of dental pulp and periodontal cells from human teeth for single-cell RNA sequencing.STAR protocols · 2021Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Dental Pulp Stem Cells According to Different Transplant Types.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Sinking Our Teeth in Getting Dental Stem Cells to Clinics for Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) are mesenchymal stem cells with high self-renewal potential that have the ability to differentiate into several cell types. Thus, DPSCs have become a promising source of cells for several applications in regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, and stem cell therapy. Numerous methods have been reported for the isolation, expansion, and preservation of DPSCs. However, methods are diverse and do not follow specific rules or parameters, which can affect stem cell properties, adding more variation to experimental results. In this review, we compare and analyze current experimental evidence to propose some factors that can be useful to establish better methods or improved protocols to prolong the quality of DPSCs. In addition, we highlight other factors related to biological aspects of dental tissue source (e.g., age, genetic background) that should be considered before tooth selection. Although current methods have reached significant advances, optimization is still required to improve culture stability and its maintenance for an extended period without losing stem cell properties. In addition, there is still much that needs to be done toward clinical application due to the fact that most of DPSCs procedures are not currently following good manufacturing practices. The establishment of optimized general or tailored protocols will allow obtaining well-defined DPSCs cultures with specific properties, which enable more reproducible results that will be the basis to develop effective and safe therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.