ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2016
Current status of three-dimensional printing inks for soft tissue regeneration.
Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biopolymer-Based 3D Printing for Dental-Pulp Complex Tissue Regeneration: Innovations and Challenges.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering: Printing Techniques, Biomaterials, Challenges, and the Emerging Role of 4D Bioprinting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Precisely Printable Silk Fibroin/Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Alginate Bioink for 3D Printing.Polymers · 2024Article
- Evaluating cells metabolic activity of bioinks for bioprinting: the role of cell-laden hydrogels and 3D printing on cell survival.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Recent advances in 3D bioprinted tumor models for personalized medicine.Translational oncology · 2023Article
- Intelligent Vascularized 3D/4D/5D/6D-Printed Tissue Scaffolds.Nano-micro letters · 2023Review
- 3D-printed placental-derived bioinks for skin tissue regeneration with improved angiogenesis and wound healing properties.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Additive manufacturing of sustainable biomaterials for biomedical applications.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Cancer Modeling and Personalized Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Natural polymer-based scaffolds for soft tissue repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting Technology and Its Applications for Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2020Review
- Natural 3D-Printed Bioinks for Skin Regeneration and Wound Healing: A Systematic Review.Polymers · 2020Review
- Synthetic Polymers for Organ 3D Printing.Polymers · 2020Review
- Preparing 3D-printable silk fibroin hydrogels with robustness by a two-step crosslinking method.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Advances in Hybrid Fabrication toward Hierarchical Tissue Constructs.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Review
- Materials and technical innovations in 3D printing in biomedical applications.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2020Review
- 3D Bioprinting Strategies for the Regeneration of Functional Tubular Tissues and Organs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2020Review
- Toward Biomimetic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: 3D Printing Techniques in Regenerative Medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies have become an attractive manufacturing process, which is called additive manufacturing or rapid prototyping. A 3D printing system can design and fabricate 3D shapes and geometries resulting in custom 3D scaffolds in tissue engineering. In tissue regeneration and replacement, 3D printing systems have been frequently used with various biomaterials such as natural and synthetic polymers. In tissue engineering, soft tissue regeneration is very difficult because soft tissue has the properties of high elasticity, flexibility and viscosity which act as an obstacle when creating a 3D structure by stacking layer after layer of biomaterials compared to hard tissue regeneration. To overcome these limitations, many studies are trying to fabricate constructs with a very similar native micro-environmental property for a complex biofunctional scaffold with suitable biological and mechanical parameters by optimizing the biomaterials, for example, control the concentration and diversification of materials. In this review, we describe the characteristics of printing biomaterials such as hydrogel, synthetic polymer and composite type as well as recent advances in soft tissue regeneration. It is expected that 3D printed constructs will be able to replace as well as regenerate defective tissues or injured functional tissues and organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.