ArticleTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2016
Enhancement of osseointegration of artificial ligament by nano-hydroxyapatite and bone morphogenic protein-2 into the rabbit femur.
Article in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Polydopamine Coating-Mediated Immobilization of BMP-2 on Polyethylene Terephthalate-Based Artificial Ligaments for Enhanced Bioactivity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The MTT assay showed that the cell proliferation on hydroxyapatite (HAp) and HAp/bone morphogenic protein (BMP) coated group was better than the control and BMP coated groups at 5 days. And after 7 days of culture, the mRNA expression levels of type I collagen, osteonectin, osteopontin, bonesialoprotein, BMP-2, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and Runx-2 in the HAp/BMP coated group were significantly higher than the other groups. Also, in this group showed the most significant induction of osteogenic gene expression compared to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) grown on the other groups. In addition, the cells in the HAp/BMP coated group delivered higher levels of ALP than the other three groups. Also, silk scaffolds were implanted as artificial ligaments in knees of rabbits, and they were harvested 1 and 3 months after implantation. On gross examination, HE staining showed that new bone tissue formation was more observed in the HAp/BMP coated group 3 weeks postoperatively. And masson staining showed that in the HAp/BMP coated group, the silk fibers were encircled by osteoblast, chondrocyte, and collagen. Furthermore, the analysis showed that the width of the graft-bone interface in the HAp and HAp/BMP coated group was narrower than that in the other two groups 3 weeks postoperatively. So, it is concluded that BMP incorporated HAp coated silk scaffold can be enhanced osseointegration and osteogenesis in bone tunnel. As a result, these experimental designs have been demonstrated to be effective in the acceleration of graft-to-bone healing by increasing new bone or fibrocartilage formation at the interface between graft and bone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.