ArticleDiabetology international2017
Impact of metabolic syndrome on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Japanese individuals with impaired insulin secretion: the Saku study.
Article in Diabetology international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo assess the impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Japanese individuals with impaired insulin secretion (IIS).
methodsThis cohort study included 1,702 individuals aged 40-59 without diabetes at baseline who underwent a comprehensive medical check-up between April 2008 and March 2009 at Saku Central Hospital. Participants were classified according to their IIS and insulin resistance (IR) status [normal, isolated IR (i-IR), or isolated IIS (i-IIS)] and MetS (presence or absence). They were followed up until March 2014. Type 2 diabetes was defined based on fasting and 2-h post-load plasma glucose concentrations and by the receipt of medical treatment for diabetes.
resultsDuring 7,572 person-years of follow-up, 92 individuals developed type 2 diabetes. The incidence rates (/1,000 person-years) for type 2 diabetes in the normal without MetS, normal with MetS, i-IR without MetS, i-IR with MetS, i-IIS without MetS, and i-IIS with MetS groups were 5.3, 3.7, 11.3, 24.7, 16.7, and 59.5, respectively. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for type 2 diabetes in the normal with MetS, i-IR with MetS, and i-IIS with MetS groups, relative to the normal without MetS group, were 0.52 (0.12-2.25), 3.78 (1.93-7.42), and 7.94 (3.96-15.91), respectively. Additionally, a positive association of MetS with type 2 diabetes was observed in the i-IIS group [HR (95 % CI) 3.56 (1.88-6.73)] but not in the normal and i-IR groups.
conclusionsThe prevention of MetS is important, particularly in individuals with low insulin secretion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.