ArticleDiabetology international2017
Insulin degludec in a simple or stepwise titration algorithm in a Japanese population of patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, 26-week, treat-to-target trial.
Article in Diabetology international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01880736 (A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible vs. Fixed Dosing and Simple vs. Stepwise Titration With Once Daily Insulin Degludec in Inadequately Treated Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible vs. Fixed Dosing and Simple vs. Stepwise Titration With Once Daily Insulin Degludec in Inadequately Treated Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Time for Using Machine Learning for Dose Guidance in Titration of People With Type 2 Diabetes? A Systematic Review of Basal Insulin Dose Guidance.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsManaging insulin therapy is a challenge for both patients and healthcare providers.The primary aim of this trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec (IDeg) in a fixed versus flexible dosing schedule. The secondary aim and subject of this manuscript was to compare a simple versus a stepwise titration algorithm. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a 26-week, controlled, multicenter, open-label, randomized, treat-to-target phase 3b trial of Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately treated with insulin glargine and with/without antidiabetic drugs orally. The trial had a 2 × 2 factorial design whereby 458 patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of two titration algorithms and one of two dosing schedules. IDeg dose was adjusted weekly using a clinician-led, treat-to-target approach in order to ensure optimal insulin titration and glycemic control following self-measured blood glucose (SMBG) readings.
resultsMean insulin dose at the end of the trial was similar in both simple and stepwise titration algorithms. Glycemic control improved in both titration algorithms, with noninferiority in glycated hemoglobin (HbA
conclusionsThis trial demonstrated comparable efficacy with noninferior HbA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.