ArticleDiabetology international2016
Predictors for achieving target glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes after initiation of basal supported oral therapy using insulin glargine: sub-analysis of the ALOHA2 study, drug use surveillance in Japan.
Article in Diabetology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term safety and efficacy of imeglimin in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: A 52-week postmarketing clinical study (TWINKLE).Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Trial
- Use of Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in East Asians: A Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to identify diabetes-related factors associated with achieving HbA1c <7.0 % after the initiation of basal supported oral therapy (BOT) in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients with an HbA1c value of ≥6.5 % during the previous 4 weeks, using data from Add-on Lantus
methodsPatients were categorized into two groups: HbA1c <7.0 % at the final evaluation point (at 24 weeks or the last visit) as HbA1c-target-achieved; HbA1c ≥7.0 % as target-not-achieved. Associations between baseline factors and HbA1c <7.0 % achievement were explored using logistic regression.
resultsOf the 1520 patients in the study, 400 patients (26.3 %) achieved HbA1c <7.0 %. Patients with diabetes duration of <1 year and between ≥1 and <2 years [odds ratio (OR): 5.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.13-24.51; OR: 3.77, 95 % CI 1.19-11.93, respectively], those on one pre-study orally administered antidiabetic agent (OAD) (OR: 2.42, 95 % CI 1.12-5.22), and those with absence of diabetic neuropathy (OR: 2.54, 95 % CI 1.12-5.76) were more likely to achieve HbA1c <7.0 % than those with duration of ≤15 years, ≥4 pre-study OADs, and neuropathy, respectively. Achievement of HbA1c <7.0 % among patients increased by approximately 20 % for each 1 % decrease in HbA1c level at baseline.
conclusionsShorter diabetes duration, pre-study regimen of one OAD, absence of neuropathy, and lower HbA1c level at baseline were associated with achievement of HbA1c <7.0 %, suggesting that earlier initiation of BOT leads to good HbA1c control in insulin-naïve Japanese type 2 diabetes patients, consistent with our early ALOHA study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.