Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30603226›Full record

ArticleBone research2018

Nucleic acids and analogs for bone regeneration.

Yuxin Zhang, Wenjuan Ma, Yuxi Zhan, Chenchen Mao, Xiaoru Shao, Xueping Xie, Xiawei Wei, Yunfeng Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advances in the Study of Extracellular Vesicles for Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. An Overview of RNA-Based Scaffolds for Osteogenesis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuxin Zhang *1State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 People's Republic of China.
Wenjuan Ma *1State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 People's Republic of China.
Yuxi Zhan1State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 People's Republic of China.
Chenchen Mao1State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 People's Republic of China.
Xiaoru Shao1State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 People's Republic of China.
Xueping Xie1State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 People's Republic of China.
Xiawei Wei2Lab of Aging Research and Nanotoxicology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041 People's Republic of China.
Yunfeng Lin1State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the incidence of different bone diseases increasing, effective therapies are needed that coordinate a combination of various technologies and biological materials. Bone tissue engineering has also been considered as a promising strategy to repair various bone defects. Therefore, different biological materials that can promote stem cell proliferation, migration, and osteoblastic differentiation to accelerate bone tissue regeneration and repair have also become the focus of research in multiple fields. Stem cell therapy, biomaterial scaffolds, and biological growth factors have shown potential for bone tissue engineering; however, off-target effects and cytotoxicity have limited their clinical use. The application of nucleic acids (deoxyribonucleic acid or ribonucleic acid) and nucleic acid analogs (peptide nucleic acids or locked nucleic acids), which are designed based on foreign genes or with special structures, can be taken up by target cells to exert different effects such as modulating protein expression, replacing a missing gene, or targeting specific gens or proteins. Due to some drawbacks, nucleic acids and nucleic acid analogs are combined with various delivery systems to exert enhanced effects, but current studies of these molecules have not yet satisfied clinical requirements. In-depth studies of nucleic acid or nucleic acid analog delivery systems have been performed, with a particular focus on bone tissue regeneration and repair. In this review, we mainly introduce delivery systems for nucleic acids and nucleic acid analogs and their applications in bone repair and regeneration. At the same time, the application of conventional scaffold materials for the delivery of nucleic acids and nucleic acid analogs is also discussed.

Identifiers

PMID30603226
PMCPMC6306486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.