Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30603068›Full record

ReviewInterface focus2019

Functional nanomaterials to augment photosynthesis: evidence and considerations for their responsible use in agricultural applications.

Thomas A Swift, Thomas A A Oliver, M Carmen Galan, Heather M Whitney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interface focus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. MnPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Uptake and bioaccumulation of iron oxide nanoparticles (FeEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Fate and impact of maghemite (γ-FeEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  13. Carbon Dots as an Emergent Class of Antimicrobial Agents.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas A SwiftBristol Centre for Functional Nanomaterials, HH Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1864-6523
Thomas A A OliverSchool of Chemistry, Cantock's Close, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-7857
M Carmen GalanSchool of Chemistry, Cantock's Close, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7307-2871
Heather M WhitneySchool of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-8266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the current population growth rate, we will soon be unable to meet increasing food demands. As a consequence of this potential problem, considerable efforts have been made to enhance crop productivity by breeding, genetics and improving agricultural practices. While these techniques have traditionally been successful, their efficacy since the 'green revolution' has begun to significantly plateau. This stagnation of gains combined with the negative effects of climate change on crop yields has prompted researchers to develop novel and radical methods to increase crop productivity. Recent work has begun exploring the use of nanomaterials as synthetic probes to augment how plants use light. Photosynthesis in crops is often limited by their ability to absorb and exploit solar energy for photochemistry. The capacity to interact with and optimize how plants use light has the potential to increase the productivity of crops and enable the tailoring of crops for different environments and to compensate for predicted climate changes. Advances in the synthesis and surface modification of nanomaterials have overcome previous drawbacks and renewed their potential use as synthetic probes to enhance crop yields. Here, we review the current applications of functional nanomaterials in plants and will make an argument for the continued development of promising new nanomaterials and future applications in agriculture. This will highlight that functional nanomaterials have the clear potential to provide a much-needed route to enhanced future food security. In addition, we will discuss the often-ignored current evidence of nanoparticles present in the environment as well as inform and encourage caution on the regulation of nanomaterials in agriculture.

Indexed as

food securitynanobionicsnanomaterialsphotosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID30603068
PMCPMC6304006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.