ReviewJournal of biological engineering2018
Tissue engineering strategies for the induction of angiogenesis using biomaterials.
Review in Journal of biological engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinspired Polymeric Scaffolds for Improvement of Angiogenesis and Tissue Engineering: A Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Article
- Immunomodulatory Delivery Materials for Tissue Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Influence of Scaffold Structure and Biomimetic Properties on Adipose Stem Cell Homing in Personalized Reconstructive Medicine.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Ionizing Radiation Crosslinked Chitosan-Based Hydrogels for Environmental Remediation.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Topological cues of microparticles train stem cells for tissue repair via mechanotransduction.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- MSC-derived extracellular vesicles: Precision miRNA delivery for overcoming cancer therapy resistance.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Exosome-based miRNA delivery: Transforming cancer treatment with mesenchymal stem cells.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Pre-vascularized porous gelatin-coated β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration: an in vivo and in vitro investigation.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2025Article
- Review
- Endothelial progenitor cells for fabrication of engineered vascular units and angiogenesis induction.Cell proliferation · 2024Review
- Two Decades of Advances and Limitations in Organ Recellularization.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- The Edifice of Vasculature-On-Chips: A Focused Review on the Key Elements and Assembly of Angiogenesis Models.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Review
- Challenges and Pitfalls of Research Designs Involving Magnesium-Based Biomaterials: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Assessing the functional potential of conditioned media derived from amniotic epithelial stem cells engineered on 3D biomimetic scaffolds: An in vitro model for tendon regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Review: Human stem cell-based 3D in vitro angiogenesis models for preclinical drug screening applications.Molecular biology reports · 2024Review
- Advancements in bioengineered and autologous skin grafting techniques for skin reconstruction: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Proteomic analysis and functional validation reveal distinct therapeutic capabilities related to priming of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells with IFN-γ and hypoxia: potential implications for their clinical use.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Novel Metal Nanomaterials to Promote Angiogenesis in Tissue Regeneration.Engineered regeneration · 2023Article
- Biocompatible scaffolds based on collagen and oxidized dextran for endothelial cell survival and function in tissue engineering.Engineering in life sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiogenesis is touted as a fundamental procedure in the regeneration and restoration of different tissues. The induction of de novo blood vessels seems to be vital to yield a successful cell transplantation rate loaded on various scaffolds. Scaffolds are natural or artificial substances that are considered as one of the means for delivering, aligning, maintaining cell connection in a favor of angiogenesis. In addition to the potential role of distinct scaffold type on vascularization, the application of some strategies such as genetic manipulation, and conjugation of pro-angiogenic factors could intensify angiogenesis potential. In the current review, we focused on the status of numerous scaffolds applicable in the field of vascular biology. Also, different strategies and priming approaches useful for the induction of pro-angiogenic signaling pathways were highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.